Comparison Overview

Svalbard Museum

VS

Queensland Museum

Svalbard Museum

Vei 231-1, Longyearbyen, NO, 9170
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://svalbardmuseum.no

Svalbard Museum shall collect, preserve, disseminate and research related to cultural and natural history, environmental information and cultural preservation on Svalbard. This is fulfilled by e.g.: - Permanent and temporary exhibitions that supports the purpose - Information - Research and publication - Education - Seminars The museum receives operational funding from the Norwegian Government. We are a member of the Norwegian Museums Association and ICOM.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Queensland Museum

Corner Grey St & Melbourne St, South Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4101
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.museum.qld.gov.au/

Queensland Museum is custodian of the state’s natural and cultural heritage, caring for more than a million items and specimens in collections that tell the changing story of Queensland. We deliver museum services across the state, through a network of public museums: Queensland Museum, Brisbane Queensland Museum Rail Workshops, Ipswich Queensland Museum Cobb+Co, Toowoomba Queensland Museum Tropics, Townsville

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 273
Subsidiaries: 62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svalbard-museum.jpeg
Svalbard Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queenslandmuseum.jpeg
Queensland Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Svalbard Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Queensland Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Svalbard Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queensland Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Svalbard Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Svalbard Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Queensland Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queensland Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svalbard-museum.jpeg
Svalbard Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queenslandmuseum.jpeg
Queensland Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Queensland Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Svalbard Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Queensland Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Svalbard Museum company.

In the current year, Queensland Museum company and Svalbard Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Queensland Museum company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Queensland Museum company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Queensland Museum company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Svalbard Museum company nor Queensland Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Queensland Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Svalbard Museum company.

Queensland Museum company employs more people globally than Svalbard Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor Queensland Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References