Comparison Overview

Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors

VS

Lindleys

Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors

1 Rocks Lane, London, undefined, W13 0DE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Sutton-Mattocks, established in 1929, is a law firm rooted in its community with offices in Barnes and Chiswick serving both commercial and private clients throughout London and the Home Counties and providing them with a West End service at High Street prices. We represent and advise a wide variety of individuals and businesses and appreciate the particular needs of each client from the first time buyer to the larger corporate organisation, working with them to achieve their objectives through an understanding of their requirements and clear communication at all stages. Our lawyers are specialists in their fields whose aim is to give every client a high level of personal service in an efficient, pragmatic and professional manner.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lindleys

Clifton, Bristol, undefined, BS1 5RR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lindleys has been providing excellent legal advice for more than a hundred years. With offices in Bristol and Clevedon, we offer a full range of legal services, tailored to meet each client’s individual needs. Dealing with all company and business matters, residential and commercial property, wills and probate, employment, disputes and mediation, our expanding law firm has a jealously guarded reputation for delivering quality legal services at competitive rates. Our dedicated team of distinguished solicitors and young, talented lawyers ensures an ideal balance of traditional values and modern forward thinking. Our client retention level is a source of pride to us and we value the personal touch. We are committed to providing quality legal services in an approachable and friendly way at a price that represents excellent value for money. We devote our energy to achieve your success. ---------- John Lindley & Co. was established in Clifton by John Lindley in the 1972, becoming known as Lindleys in 1987. In 1994, Lindleys merged with, David Johnstone & Co, which originated in the 1890s, to form Lindley Johnstone Solicitors Limited. In 1996 Lindleys incorporated Stevens & Co and started trading as a limited company. Perceiving a need for a ‘city’ approach to ‘country’ matters, Lindleys opened its Clevedon office in 2000. Today, the firm continues to grow and recently appointed its fourth Director in 2011.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutton-mattocks-&-co-llp.jpeg
Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindleys.jpeg
Lindleys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lindleys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindleys in 2025.

Incident History — Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lindleys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindleys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutton-mattocks-&-co-llp.jpeg
Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindleys.jpeg
Lindleys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lindleys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lindleys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company.

In the current year, Lindleys company and Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lindleys company nor Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lindleys company nor Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lindleys company nor Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company nor Lindleys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company nor Lindleys company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lindleys company employs more people globally than Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sutton-Mattocks Solicitors nor Lindleys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X