Comparison Overview

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

VS

Banner Health

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

2 Brighton Road, Suite 300, Clifton, NJ, US, 07012
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Analytics-driven business process and technology solutions to optimize healthcare’s financial and clinical performance. Sutherland is an experience-led digital transformation company. Our mission is to deliver exceptionally engineered experiences for customers and employees today, that continue to delight tomorrow. For over 35 years, we have cared for our customers’ customers, delivering measurable results and accelerating growth. Our proprietary, AI-based products and platforms are built using robust IP and automation. We are a team of global professionals, operationally effective, culturally meshed, and committed to our clients and to one another. We call it One Sutherland. #MakeDigitalHuman

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 4,117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Banner Health

2901 N Central Ave., None, Phoenix, AZ, US, 85012
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Arizona, Banner Health is one of the largest nonprofit health care systems in the country. The system owns and operates 33 acute-care hospitals, Banner Health Network, Banner – University Medicine, academic and employed physician groups, long-term care centers, outpatient surgery centers and an array of other services; including Banner Urgent Care, family clinics, home care and hospice services, pharmacies and a nursing registry. Banner Health is in six states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Nebraska, Nevada and Wyoming.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 34,176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland_healthcare_solutions.jpeg
Sutherland Healthcare Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sutherland Healthcare Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Banner Health
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutherland Healthcare Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banner Health in 2025.

Incident History — Sutherland Healthcare Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Banner Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banner Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland_healthcare_solutions.jpeg
Sutherland Healthcare Solutions
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Computers
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banner-health.jpeg
Banner Health
Incidents

FAQ

Banner Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Banner Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company.

In the current year, Banner Health company and Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Banner Health company nor Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Banner Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Banner Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company nor Banner Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company nor Banner Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Banner Health company employs more people globally than Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sutherland Healthcare Solutions nor Banner Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X