Comparison Overview

Suspek Productions

VS

CINESA

Suspek Productions

123 mary st, Pittsburgh, 15216, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Suspek Productions is a small business that specializes in digital media such as film/photo/video/editing. Grasping the creation process, the team will transition your idea into a visual interpretation for your audience. Experience in Writing, Development, Directing, Acting, Editing, Marketing & Advertisement. Let Suspek Productions take the reins of your next media project and bring it to life. Located in the U.S. Send ALL inquires to [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CINESA

Rosselló i Porcel, 21, Barcelona, 08016, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 750 and 799

CINESA es la empresa líder en exhibición cinematográfica en España, gracias a los 11 millones de espectadores que cada año visitan una de las casi 450 salas, repartidas en los 37 cines que tiene en las mejores localizaciones de las principales ciudades españolas. Destacan los 14 cines de Madrid y 7 en Barcelona. Cinesa forma parte de ODEON Cinemas Group, el mayor exhibidor de Europa, que cuenta con presencia en 9 países a través de más de 290 cines, 2.500 pantallas y más de 9.000 empleados. En 2016, el Grupo fue adquirido por AMC Theatres dando lugar a la mayor compañía de exhibición cinematográfica del mundo.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 700
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suspek-productions.jpeg
Suspek Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinesa.jpeg
CINESA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Suspek Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CINESA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suspek Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CINESA in 2025.

Incident History — Suspek Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suspek Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CINESA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CINESA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suspek-productions.jpeg
Suspek Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinesa.jpeg
CINESA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Suspek Productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CINESA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CINESA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Suspek Productions company.

In the current year, CINESA company and Suspek Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CINESA company nor Suspek Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CINESA company nor Suspek Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CINESA company nor Suspek Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Suspek Productions company nor CINESA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Suspek Productions company nor CINESA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CINESA company employs more people globally than Suspek Productions company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Suspek Productions nor CINESA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N