Comparison Overview

STL, Inc

VS

Conquest Graphics

STL, Inc

121 NE Victory Ave, None, Gresham, Oregon, US, 97030-0366
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

STL, Inc manufactures the highest quality labels with efficient, innovative processes designed to reduce waste and eliminate error, making us one of the most reliable label vendors in the market. Our passion for top-notch customer service means a smooth, hassle-free experience and has lead to us being a key partner to our clients’ operations and an ally in driving efficiency and innovation into their production processes. We continually develop and improve processes, which creates value for our clients and brings the cost of label production down. Our innovative high-capacity spooled rolls provide an unmatched value by slashing downtime and saving our customers millions of dollars. As one of the most experienced manufacturers in the industry, STL is honored to partner with some of the world’s most sought after brands in developing label products and processes to meet the needs of the next generation of labeled goods. All of our labels are put through rigorous testing to ensure reliable, consistent quality, perfect function, and durability.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Conquest Graphics

3900-A Carolina Avenue, Richmond, 23222, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We opened our doors as Lewis Printing Company in Richmond, Virginia on January 2, 1922. In just four years the business outgrew its space at 21 N.12th Street and moved to 1107 East Cary Street, where it stayed for about 40 years. In 1964, we moved into a larger, custom-built production facility at 900 W. Leigh Street, where we operated for 42 years. In 1990, we changed our name to Lewis Creative Technologies to reflect the changing times. In 1996, we once again opened new doors with an Internet website. In 2006, we moved into a spacious 90,000 square foot facility by Richmond International Raceway and changed our name to Conquest Graphics, and to better serve a growing national customer base, we expanded again to include additional operations, which allow us to provide faster service to West Coast clients. What you may not know about us is that we are one of the largest and oldest privately-held printing companies in the nation. We operate out of two modern, energy-efficient, and secure facilities with over 130,000 square feet of manufacturing space. Today, as a fourth-generation, family business, through the leadership of President, Chris Lewis, we are continuing to grow and make significant leaps and investments in the deployment of technologies that serve our traditional print and digital communications clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superior-tape-&-label-inc.jpeg
STL, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conquest-graphics.jpeg
Conquest Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STL, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conquest Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STL, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conquest Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — STL, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STL, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conquest Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conquest Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superior-tape-&-label-inc.jpeg
STL, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conquest-graphics.jpeg
Conquest Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both STL, Inc company and Conquest Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Conquest Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to STL, Inc company.

In the current year, Conquest Graphics company and STL, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor STL, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor STL, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor STL, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STL, Inc company nor Conquest Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither STL, Inc company nor Conquest Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conquest Graphics company employs more people globally than STL, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STL, Inc nor Conquest Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N