Comparison Overview

Superior Print

VS

Drukkerij Groels

Superior Print

840 South Indiana Ave, Sellersburg, IN, 47172, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating 25 years of business in August 2013, Superior Print has served the industry as a trade-only, business forms print shop. Consistently ranked as one of the top 100 trade printers in the country over the years, our most popular products are: Laser cut sheets, NCR documents, note pads, envelopes, laser checks, and banking documents. Our niche has always been MICR encoded and CAR/LAR image processing forms. Our facility can print, test and verify all documents to the latest banking standards to ensure that our forms are producing high read rates. We carry a variety of stock forms, but can produce any custom laser cut sheet, continuous, fanapart or snap-out form. Taking the time to understand the needs of our customers helps us choose the right mix of products and services that best fit each individual customer. In-house typesetting, warehousing, full bindery capabilities and online storefronts are available services. Family owned and operated since 1988, the values of keeping our word and producing a quality product at a reasonable price is part of our mission.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Drukkerij Groels

De Grote Beer 10, ’s-Hertogenbosch, 5215 MP, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Drukkerij Groels (fsc gecertificeerd) staat voor kwaliteit en innovatie! Ervaren vakmensen en de laatste technologie gecombineerd in 1 hybride bedrijf. Onze relaties kiezen bewust voor ons concept: druk & print & afwerking in eigen huis. Specialiteiten zijn: 3d lak, (laser)stansen, foliedruk, metallicdruk Om meer resultaat uit de communicatie-inspanningen te halen bieden we ook crossmediale diensten aan. We helpen daarmee uw doelstellingen te realiseren met print, online en digitale media. Voor specialistisch werk neemt u contact op met een van onze accountmanagers en voor het standaard-drukwerk, in kleine oplagen, kunt u ook gebruik maken van onze webportal www.ipress4u.nl. Bekijk op www.groels.nl de verdere mogelijkheden.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superior-print.jpeg
Superior Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drukkerij-groels.jpeg
Drukkerij Groels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Superior Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Drukkerij Groels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Superior Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Drukkerij Groels in 2025.

Incident History — Superior Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Superior Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Drukkerij Groels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drukkerij Groels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superior-print.jpeg
Superior Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drukkerij-groels.jpeg
Drukkerij Groels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Superior Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drukkerij Groels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Drukkerij Groels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Superior Print company.

In the current year, Drukkerij Groels company and Superior Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor Superior Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor Superior Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor Superior Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Superior Print company nor Drukkerij Groels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Superior Print company nor Drukkerij Groels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Superior Print company employs more people globally than Drukkerij Groels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Superior Print nor Drukkerij Groels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L