Comparison Overview

State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill

VS

University of Alabama at Birmingham

State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill

SUNY Cobleskill, State Route 7, Cobleskill, New York 12043, Cobleskill, NY, 12043, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cobleskill.edu

The State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill has a rich academic tradition that spans nearly 100 years. Today, over 2,500 students are enrolled in the 52 associate and baccalaureate degree programs offered through The School of Agriculture and Natural Resources and The School of Business and Liberal Arts & Sciences.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 316
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Administration Bldg Suite 1070, BIRMINGHAM, AL, 35294-0110, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799
http://uab.edu

Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medical center with over $700 million in research awards annually, as well as Alabama’s largest single employer, with some 26,000 employees, and has an annual economic impact exceeding $7.15 billion on the state. The pillars of UAB’s mission include education, research, innovation and economic development, community engagement, and patient care. Learn more at www.uab.edu.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 15,902
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suny-cobleskill.jpeg
State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uab.jpeg
University of Alabama at Birmingham
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Alabama at Birmingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2025.

Incident History — State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Alabama at Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Alabama at Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suny-cobleskill.jpeg
State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uab.jpeg
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Alabama at Birmingham company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Alabama at Birmingham company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company.

In the current year, University of Alabama at Birmingham company and State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Alabama at Birmingham company nor State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Alabama at Birmingham company nor State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Alabama at Birmingham company nor State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company nor University of Alabama at Birmingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Alabama at Birmingham company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company.

University of Alabama at Birmingham company employs more people globally than State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model.

Published
Date
2025-10-24
Updated
Date
2025-10-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Deck Mate 2 lacks a verified secure-boot chain and runtime integrity validation for its controller and display modules. Without cryptographic boot verification, an attacker with physical access can modify or replace the bootloader, kernel, or filesystem and gain persistent code execution on reboot. This weakness allows long-term firmware tampering that survives power cycles. The vendor indicates that more recent firmware updates strengthen update-chain integrity and disable physical update ports to mitigate related attack avenues.

Published
Date
2025-10-24
Updated
Date
2025-10-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units.

Published
Date
2025-10-24
Updated
Date
2025-10-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS bc-fips on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java LTS bcprov-lts8on on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCMSIV.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA224NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA3NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHAKENativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA512NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA384NativeDigest.Java. This issue affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS: from 2.1.0 through 2.1.1; Bouncy Castle for Java LTS: from 2.73.0 through 2.73.7.

Published
Date
2025-10-24
Updated
Date
2025-10-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. In versions from 38.0.0 to before 38.0.3, the implementation of component-model related host-to-wasm trampolines in Wasmtime contained a bug where it's possible to carefully craft a component, which when called in a specific way, would crash the host with a segfault or assert failure. Wasmtime 38.0.3 has been released and is patched to fix this issue. There are no workarounds.

Published
Date
2025-10-24
Updated
Date
2025-10-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References