Comparison Overview

Sunhillo Corporation

VS

Western Digital

Sunhillo Corporation

444 Kelley Drive, West Berlin, New Jersey, 08091, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered near Philadelphia International Airport with satellite offices at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center (WJHTC) in Atlantic City, New Jersey, Sunhillo specialize in surveillance data distribution and and interoperability for network-centric sensors and air traffic management solutions.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Western Digital

5601 Great Oaks Parkway, San Jose, CA, US, 95138
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

At Western Digital, our vision is to unleash the power and value of data. For decades, we have been at the forefront of storage innovation, which fuels our mission to be the market leader in data storage, delivering solutions for now and the future. We are committed to providing scalable, sustainable technology for the world’s hyperscalers, enterprises, and cloud providers, and delivering cutting-edge innovation that will drive the next generation of AI-driven data workloads. All that we do is powered by our people, who are united in a common purpose of creating solutions that move the world forward. Learn more at www.westerndigital.com.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 22,284
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunhillo-corporation.jpeg
Sunhillo Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/western-digital.jpeg
Western Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sunhillo Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Western Digital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunhillo Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Western Digital has 325.53% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Sunhillo Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunhillo Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Western Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Western Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunhillo-corporation.jpeg
Sunhillo Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Improper Input Validation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/western-digital.jpeg
Western Digital
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network (Remote)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network (HTTP POST request)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sunhillo Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Western Digital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Western Digital company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sunhillo Corporation company.

In the current year, Western Digital company has reported more cyber incidents than Sunhillo Corporation company.

Western Digital company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Sunhillo Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Western Digital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Sunhillo Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Western Digital company nor Sunhillo Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Sunhillo Corporation company and Western Digital company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Western Digital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sunhillo Corporation company.

Western Digital company employs more people globally than Sunhillo Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware Manufacturing.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sunhillo Corporation nor Western Digital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.