Comparison Overview

Sunday Morning

VS

LN Design Co.

Sunday Morning

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Sunday Morning is a Graphic Design studio located in New York City, focused on design platforms for brands, institutions & individuals. We own the knowledge of Branding, the passion for Arts and Cultural Platforms, the conscience of Social Design and the responsiveness of a Startup. Client list: Samsung, Nike, Target, IBM, Cotton USA, David Byrne, ArtScene, TED, Dell, Walmart, Mayor League Baseball, Levi’s, Coca-Cola, KPMG, American Express, Irish America, Magazine, Pearson, Tecate, McDonalds & The US Census Bureau among others. Awards: Type Directors Club - Medal of typographic excellence 2012 Communication Arts - Typography Annual 2012 Béhance – Featured Project 2011

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LN Design Co.

2700 Louisiana Avenue South #26762, Minneapolis, 55426, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

A women-owned graphic design business formed in 2017. We serve clients with a strong mix of skills in creative thinking, brand development and production for both print and electronic media. With expertise in developing brands and designing visual systems, we design and develop anything that can be printed, read, scrolled, clicked, presented or shared.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunday-morning.jpeg
Sunday Morning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ln-design-co.jpeg
LN Design Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sunday Morning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LN Design Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunday Morning in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LN Design Co. in 2025.

Incident History — Sunday Morning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunday Morning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LN Design Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LN Design Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunday-morning.jpeg
Sunday Morning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ln-design-co.jpeg
LN Design Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sunday Morning company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LN Design Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LN Design Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sunday Morning company.

In the current year, LN Design Co. company and Sunday Morning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LN Design Co. company nor Sunday Morning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LN Design Co. company nor Sunday Morning company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LN Design Co. company nor Sunday Morning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sunday Morning company nor LN Design Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sunday Morning company nor LN Design Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Sunday Morning company and LN Design Co. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sunday Morning nor LN Design Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X