Comparison Overview

Suncor

VS

aramco

Suncor

150 - 6 Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

In 1967, we pioneered commercial development of Canada's oil sands – one of the largest petroleum resource basins in the world. Since then, Suncor has grown to become a globally competitive integrated energy company with a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets, a strong balance sheet and significant growth prospects. Suncor’s operations include oil sands development and upgrading, conventional and offshore oil and gas production, petroleum refining, and product marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. Our use of innovative technology has made us an industry leader in the energy business – and with a strong strategy for growth, Suncor offers a solid foundation for you to continue building your career. As an employer, Suncor is one of the best companies in Canada, providing tremendous future potential where talented people thrive and lead. As our business evolves, so do our employment opportunities. Our work culture includes a dynamic mix of newcomers and experienced professionals, with a diversity of skills and expertise from all parts of Canada.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 14,321
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

aramco

P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, undefined, 31311, SA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s largest integrated energy and chemicals companies. And we are part of the global effort toward building a low carbon economy. Our horizon has never been clearer.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 152,474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suncor.jpeg
Suncor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saudi-aramco.jpeg
aramco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Suncor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
aramco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suncor in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for aramco in 2025.

Incident History — Suncor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suncor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suncor.jpeg
Suncor
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saudi-aramco.jpeg
aramco
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Cyber warfare, industrial espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

aramco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Suncor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Suncor company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to aramco company.

In the current year, aramco company and Suncor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither aramco company nor Suncor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither aramco company nor Suncor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Both aramco company and Suncor company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Suncor company nor aramco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Suncor company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to aramco company.

aramco company employs more people globally than Suncor company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Suncor nor aramco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N