Comparison Overview

Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health

VS

Healthier Kids Foundation

Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health

12-28 Macedon Street, Sunbury, 3429, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health is a not-for-profit community health organisation providing a comprehensive range of free and low cost health, wellbeing and community services in early childhood, youth, families, adults, aged and disability. Covering an area of over 1700 km2 from Sunbury to beyond the borders of Macedon Ranges Shire our 280 staff and 100 volunteers are based across four sites at Kyneton, Romsey, Sunbury and Woodend. As two separate organisations up until 1 January 2021 we were an integral part of our respective communities for over 40 years. Together we will continue to provide the high quality services that people have come to expect.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Healthier Kids Foundation

4040 Moorpark Ave, San Jose, California, 95117, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Healthier Kids Foundation’s mission is to remove barriers impacting the health, learning, and life success of all Silicon Valley youth. To achieve our mission, we focus on three key strategies: (1) Improving healthcare access and utilization, (2) Changing health behavior through education and (3) Advocating for health policy and systems change.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunburycobaw-community-health.jpeg
Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthier-kids-foundation.jpeg
Healthier Kids Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Healthier Kids Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Healthier Kids Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Healthier Kids Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Healthier Kids Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunburycobaw-community-health.jpeg
Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthier-kids-foundation.jpeg
Healthier Kids Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Healthier Kids Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Healthier Kids Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company.

In the current year, Healthier Kids Foundation company and Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Healthier Kids Foundation company nor Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Healthier Kids Foundation company nor Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Healthier Kids Foundation company nor Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company nor Healthier Kids Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company nor Healthier Kids Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health company employs more people globally than Healthier Kids Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sunbury and Cobaw Community Health nor Healthier Kids Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H