Comparison Overview

Sun Mechanical Systems

VS

A.W. Chesterton Company

Sun Mechanical Systems

1900 Tyler Road, St. Charles, IL, 60174, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sun Mechanical Systems is a full-service design/build HVAC firm servicing the Chicagoland expanded region, as well as selected national sites since 2005. Located in St. Charles, Illinois our headquarters holds office and warehouse space allowing our team to combine the use of technology with readily available equipment to bring you the best in HVAC system servicing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A.W. Chesterton Company

860 Salem St, Groveland, Massachusetts, 01834, US
Last Update: 2025-11-05
Between 750 and 799

Chesterton is a leading international provider of customized programs and solutions that combine expert hands-on service and support with a comprehensive line of industrial fluid sealing systems, high performance protective coatings, and broad range of high performance Industrial Lubricants and MRO chemicals. Chesterton solutions have been implemented around the world with documented success and recognition. Increased equipment reliability, energy consumption optimization, and technical support are what Chesterton offers with a portfolio of products and services unparalleled in the industry. Company Vision: Our vision is to be recognized as the best partner in providing customized programs, hands-on service and support, and high performance products to help industrial process industry customers improve business performance and competitiveness, while helping them increase reliability, efficiency and compliance. Locations Our manufacturing operations, service centers, sales and distributor facilities are located in over 100 countries around the worldwide. With over 1,200 trained local specialists and technicians, Chesterton delivers exceptional service and solutions to meet their customers'​ needs Knowledgeable Service Chesterton, in partnership with their distributors, provides world class customer service. Their knowledgeable local specialists and technicians work closely with customers to provide the best solutions and services to meet industry challenges

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 948
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sun-mechanical-systems.jpeg
Sun Mechanical Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a--w--chesterton-company.jpeg
A.W. Chesterton Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sun Mechanical Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A.W. Chesterton Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sun Mechanical Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.W. Chesterton Company in 2025.

Incident History — Sun Mechanical Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sun Mechanical Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A.W. Chesterton Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.W. Chesterton Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sun-mechanical-systems.jpeg
Sun Mechanical Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a--w--chesterton-company.jpeg
A.W. Chesterton Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A.W. Chesterton Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sun Mechanical Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A.W. Chesterton Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sun Mechanical Systems company.

In the current year, A.W. Chesterton Company company and Sun Mechanical Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A.W. Chesterton Company company nor Sun Mechanical Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A.W. Chesterton Company company nor Sun Mechanical Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A.W. Chesterton Company company nor Sun Mechanical Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems company nor A.W. Chesterton Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems company nor A.W. Chesterton Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

A.W. Chesterton Company company employs more people globally than Sun Mechanical Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sun Mechanical Systems nor A.W. Chesterton Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H