Comparison Overview

Summit Labels

VS

roden

Summit Labels

1353 Kebet Way, Port Coquitlam, V3C, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

We’re a team of innovators who provide rocket fuel (in the form of really great labels) to help our clients reach their dreams. Our clients say we’re their partner in creativity, a team of problem solvers who make their lives easier and who they trust to take their brand to the next level. We’re privileged to work with many well-known consumer packaged goods companies across the world, including those in sports nutrition, wine, craft beer, cosmetics, nutraceuticals, beverages and food. For a preview of some of our work, visit our Instagram page: @summitlabels.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

roden

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

We try to provide everything in printed matter. For example business cards, envelopes but also the more specific products like magazines, credit cards, banners etc. Besides printed matter we provide office furniture and multifunctionals from Kyocera Mita. The company is founded in 1991 and is still operating succesfull. The company is located in Roden which is a town in Drenthe, the Netherlands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/summitlabels.jpeg
Summit Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
roden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Summit Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
roden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Summit Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for roden in 2025.

Incident History — Summit Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Summit Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — roden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

roden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/summitlabels.jpeg
Summit Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
roden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

roden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Summit Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, roden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Summit Labels company.

In the current year, roden company and Summit Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither roden company nor Summit Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither roden company nor Summit Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither roden company nor Summit Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Summit Labels company nor roden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Summit Labels company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to roden company.

Summit Labels company employs more people globally than roden company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Summit Labels nor roden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N