Comparison Overview

Summersdale Publishers

VS

Archive of Our Own

Summersdale Publishers

PO19 1RP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1990, Summersdale is a vibrant publisher that puts its heart and soul into creating exceptional books. We swiftly respond to emerging technology and trends, provide entertaining, informative and innovative content in the genres of travel writing, general non-fiction, health and well-being, and gift and humour. We now produce a diverse range of over 150 titles per year, with a backlist of over 600 titles. High standards of editing, design and production are essential elements in all of our products, backed up by a dedicated sales and publicity department giving comprehensive worldwide sales coverage. Summersdale’s books are also published digitally as eBooks and audiobooks.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Archive of Our Own

undefined, Online Multinational, undefined, undefined, OO
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The Archive of Our Own (AO3) is a noncommercial host for fanfiction/fanworks using open-source software. As of 2023 it hosts over 11 million works & nearly 6 million registered users from around the world. In 2019 it received a Hugo Award for Best Related Work. AO3 is a project of non-profit The Organization for Transformative Works, an all-volunteer, donor supported entity which manages five central projects focused on the preservation of fanworks and fan history.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/summersdale-publishers-1.jpeg
Summersdale Publishers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archive-of-our-own.jpeg
Archive of Our Own
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Summersdale Publishers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Archive of Our Own
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Summersdale Publishers in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archive of Our Own in 2025.

Incident History — Summersdale Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Summersdale Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Archive of Our Own (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archive of Our Own cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/summersdale-publishers-1.jpeg
Summersdale Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archive-of-our-own.jpeg
Archive of Our Own
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Summersdale Publishers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Archive of Our Own company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Archive of Our Own company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Summersdale Publishers company.

In the current year, Archive of Our Own company and Summersdale Publishers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Archive of Our Own company nor Summersdale Publishers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Archive of Our Own company nor Summersdale Publishers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Archive of Our Own company nor Summersdale Publishers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Summersdale Publishers company nor Archive of Our Own company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Archive of Our Own company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Summersdale Publishers company.

Summersdale Publishers company employs more people globally than Archive of Our Own company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Summersdale Publishers nor Archive of Our Own holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.