Comparison Overview

Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE

VS

Gestamp

Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE

Brandgehaege 11 Wolfsburg, 38444, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sebn.com

Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE (SEBN) is a global automotive supplier with over 36,000 employees in 13 countries. SEBN is part of the Japanese group Sumitomo Electric Industries, which has 380 subsidiaries in various industries worldwide. The more than 400-year-old Sumitomo Electric Group employs 280,000 people and had net sales of 30 billion USD in 2023. SEBN`s product portfolio comprises wiring systems for conventional and electric drive technologies, including low- and high-voltage wiring harnesses. In collaboration with other entities with the Sumitomo Electric Group, it also provides electrical and electronic components. SEBN`s customer base includes well-known automobile manufacturers and their respective brands. For more information: www.sebn.com

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gestamp

Calle de Alfonso XII, 16, Madrid, Community of Madrid, 28014, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gestamp.com

Gestamp is a multinational specialized in the design, development and manufacture of highly engineered metal components for the main vehicle manufacturers. It develops products with an innovative design to produce lighter and safer vehicles, which offer lower energy consumption and a lower environmental impact. Its products cover the areas of BiW, chassis and mechanisms. Gestamp is present in 24 countries with 115 production plants, 13 R&D centers and a workforce of more than 44,000 employees worldwide.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 15,647
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sumitomo-electric-bordnetze-se.jpeg
Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gestamp.jpeg
Gestamp
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gestamp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gestamp in 2025.

Incident History — Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gestamp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gestamp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sumitomo-electric-bordnetze-se.jpeg
Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gestamp.jpeg
Gestamp
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gestamp company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gestamp company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company.

In the current year, Gestamp company and Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gestamp company nor Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gestamp company nor Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gestamp company nor Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company nor Gestamp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gestamp company.

Gestamp company employs more people globally than Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sumitomo Electric Bordnetze SE nor Gestamp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References