Comparison Overview

Sultan Global Group

VS

Peel Development Commission

Sultan Global Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Sultan Global Group (SGG) is a full-service consulting firm specializing in Government Affairs, Engagement and Advisory and Strategy and Development. SGG will grow and add the following capabilities: corporate citizenship, sustainability, communications and multi-media. The Government Affairs, Engagement & Advisory (GAEA) practice includes U.S. State and Federal Government Relations & Lobbying in addition to International Government Relations & Lobbying and will include members who are experts and leaders in these areas. In the international space, SGG will provide global coverage by region – Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, Former Soviet States, Africa and Latin America. Initial GAEA services provided by SGG will include intelligence around strategic country entry such as stakeholder identification and engagement strategies. The firm will also provide political insight, assistance and advisory regarding regulations, public policy issues advisory, and crisis management. Our initial Strategy & Development (S&D) services will include emerging markets strategies, anti-corruption/compliance and controls, business development strategy and growth strategies. At SGG, we have unique expertise which allows us to comfortably tackle challenges for our multi-industry and multi-sector clients. Contact us: Saadia Sultan Managing Partner Direct: 713 851 4029 [email protected] www.sultanglobalgroup.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Peel Development Commission

45 Mandurah Terrace, Mandurah, Western Australia, 6210, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Western Australia’s Peel region is on the brink of exciting change. Over the next two decades it will welcome a dramatic wave of people attracted by the area’s abundant resources, picturesque environment and enviable lifestyle. This influx will establish Peel as one of the State’s biggest population centres, bring with it exciting new vibrancy and prosperity as well as challenges for the community. By 2050, Peel is expected to rival the South West as one of the most populated regions outside of Perth with a projected population of 444,000. This influx will bring with it exciting new vibrancy and prosperity as well as challenges for the community. The Peel Development Commission has embraced this challenge and has worked closely with more than 200 stakeholders to form a shared view of Peel’s future as a “Progressive, Prosperous and Dynamic Region”.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sultan-global-group.jpeg
Sultan Global Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peel-development-commission.jpeg
Peel Development Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sultan Global Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peel Development Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sultan Global Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peel Development Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Sultan Global Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sultan Global Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peel Development Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peel Development Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sultan-global-group.jpeg
Sultan Global Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peel-development-commission.jpeg
Peel Development Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sultan Global Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peel Development Commission company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Peel Development Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sultan Global Group company.

In the current year, Peel Development Commission company and Sultan Global Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Peel Development Commission company nor Sultan Global Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Peel Development Commission company nor Sultan Global Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Peel Development Commission company nor Sultan Global Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sultan Global Group company nor Peel Development Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sultan Global Group company nor Peel Development Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peel Development Commission company employs more people globally than Sultan Global Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sultan Global Group nor Peel Development Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L