Comparison Overview

Seattle University Law Review

VS

NU Resource Center

Seattle University Law Review

901 12th Ave, None, Seattle, Washington, US, 98122
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Seattle University Law Review was originally published as the University of Puget Sound Law Review. Its inaugural issue was published in 1975, with the first Editor in Chief writing, "Striving to attain a quality of legal writing and analysis commensurate with the nascent tradition at this law school, the Editorial Board publishes this intramural edition. Hopefully this volume... represents a first and significant step toward a national law review that will serve the legal community..."​ The Law Review continues to maintain this dedication to legal scholarship. The Fall Issue of Volume 1 in 1977 marked the beginning of our publication in earnest as the University of Puget Sound Law Review. On August 19, 1994, the Law School was transferred to Seattle University under the stewardship of SU President Father William J. Sullivan, S.J. The Law School joined the Seattle University main campus for Fall Term, 1999, and the Seattle University Law Review continues to advance legal education, writing, and scholarship. The Seattle University Law Review provides valuable educational experiences to its members. The journal’s writing and editing assignments give student members opportunities to improve their writing skills and research techniques. Law Review work also strengthens a student’s ability to analyze problems in unfamiliar areas of the law. Finally, the self-discipline and analytical proficiency needed to succeed while on the Law Review proves invaluable to students after leaving law school.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NU Resource Center

undefined, Erlanger , Kentucky, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

For over 120 years, National Underwriter, a division of ALM Media, LLC has been the first in line with the targeted tax, insurance, and financial planning information you need to make critical business decisions. Boasting nearly a century of expert experience, our reputable editors are dedicated to putting accurate and relevant information right at your fingertips. With Tax Facts, FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation, Tools & Techniques, Field Guide, Insurance Coverage Law Center, Property & Casualty Coverage Guides and other resources available in print, eBook, or online, you can be assured that as the industry evolves National Underwriter will be at the forefront with the thorough and easy-to-use resources you rely on for success.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulr.jpeg
Seattle University Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-underwriter-company.jpeg
NU Resource Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seattle University Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NU Resource Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle University Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NU Resource Center in 2025.

Incident History — Seattle University Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle University Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NU Resource Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NU Resource Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulr.jpeg
Seattle University Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-underwriter-company.jpeg
NU Resource Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Seattle University Law Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NU Resource Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NU Resource Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seattle University Law Review company.

In the current year, NU Resource Center company and Seattle University Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NU Resource Center company nor Seattle University Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NU Resource Center company nor Seattle University Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NU Resource Center company nor Seattle University Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seattle University Law Review company nor NU Resource Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NU Resource Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Seattle University Law Review company.

Seattle University Law Review company employs more people globally than NU Resource Center company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seattle University Law Review nor NU Resource Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.