Comparison Overview

Sullivan Law

VS

Legal Eye Ltd

Sullivan Law

1625 NV-88, Minden, Nevada, 89423, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sullivan Law is dedicated to compassionately helping people who need legal assistance. Since 1981, we have represented clients in Nevada, California, and Arizona. If you are seeking an experienced lawyer to represent you, please contact Sullivan Law to find out about our legal services. While our law office is well-versed in many practice areas, we are highly experienced when it comes to handling personal injury and civil litigation claims. Our practice encompasses the following: - Business and commercial law - Estate planning, trust administration, probate - Real estate law - State and federal litigation and appeals - Car accidents - Railroad accidents - Premises liability - Wrongful death - Slip and fall - Intellectual property: trademark and copyright

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Eye Ltd

Thame, Oxfordshire, GB, OX9 3AJ
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Legal Eye provides sound knowledge and a selection of practical solutions to comply with ever-changing regulatory framework. The advice we offer is clear and practical, and we pride ourselves on our exceptional customer service. We work with a variety of law firms, providers of legal services, Lenders, Estate Agents, Housing Associations and others, tailoring our advice to suit the needs of individual, taking into account size, location, client base, service areas and risk profile. Our friendly and experienced team will help you understand the regulations and industry requirements to adapt your processes and procedures. We offer advice on the following;- Risk and compliance support Complaint Handling Service Price transparency Online compliance training Policy and procedure precedents COFA support File Reviews LEQS (Legal Eye Quality Scheme) GDPR Advice Lexcel Accreditation Support ISO9001 accreditation support ISO27001 accreditation support On site training Subscribe to our updates http://eepurl.com/du4Kv5 Email us : [email protected] Call us on: 020 3051 2049

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 220
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sullivan-law.jpeg
Sullivan Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sullivan Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Eye Ltd
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sullivan Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Eye Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Sullivan Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sullivan Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Eye Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Eye Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sullivan-law.jpeg
Sullivan Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-eye-compliance.jpeg
Legal Eye Ltd
Incidents

FAQ

Sullivan Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Legal Eye Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legal Eye Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sullivan Law company.

In the current year, Legal Eye Ltd company and Sullivan Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Eye Ltd company nor Sullivan Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Eye Ltd company nor Sullivan Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Eye Ltd company nor Sullivan Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sullivan Law company nor Legal Eye Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sullivan Law company nor Legal Eye Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Eye Ltd company employs more people globally than Sullivan Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sullivan Law nor Legal Eye Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X