Comparison Overview

Sull Graphics

VS

AMI Graphics

Sull Graphics

2220 Airport Industrial Dr, Ball Ground, GA, 30107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sullgraphics.com

Since 1988, Sull Graphics has grown to be the one-stop shop for all of your graphics and open-ended printing needs, whether it is creative design services, high-end static printing for branding or complex variable printing for customer/donor acquisition, loyalty and retention. Sull Graphics will continue to solidify itself as the premier marketing services provider in Atlanta and the Southeastern region for all print/mail communications needs as well as new and emerging technologies associated with printing and direct marketing. Our goal is to offer complete solutions backed by precision and quality at a good value. We promise to complete your job with the attention to detail and promptness you deserve and expect. Our mission is to be the customer's first choice for graphic communications, delivering products of outstanding quality with integrity and great service at a competitive price through working faster, simpler, and together. #printisreal

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AMI Graphics

223 Drake Hill Road, Strafford, NH, 03884, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://amigraphics.com/

AMI Graphics is a nationally recognized, full service, large format print manufacturer specializing in the design, print, production, and installation of sports facility, event, commercial, and retail signage. With strategic locations in southern New Hampshire and central Florida, AMI Graphics'​ products include: indoor and outdoor banners, printed windscreens, wall murals, fleet graphics & vehicle lettering, floor graphics, backlit signs, custom dimensional signage, window graphics, custom fabricated solutions, American flags, custom flags, pennant strings, wind flags, patriotic bunting, and much more. Whether you already know your signage needs or aren't sure where to start, our experienced team is ready to guide you through the entire process - from concept to completion.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sull-graphics.jpeg
Sull Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ami-graphics.jpeg
AMI Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sull Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AMI Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sull Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMI Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Sull Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sull Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AMI Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMI Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sull-graphics.jpeg
Sull Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ami-graphics.jpeg
AMI Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AMI Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sull Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AMI Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sull Graphics company.

In the current year, AMI Graphics company and Sull Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AMI Graphics company nor Sull Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AMI Graphics company nor Sull Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AMI Graphics company nor Sull Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sull Graphics company nor AMI Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sull Graphics company nor AMI Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sull Graphics company employs more people globally than AMI Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sull Graphics nor AMI Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References