Comparison Overview

Sulgrave Manor

VS

New York City Fire Museum

Sulgrave Manor

Manor Road, Banbury, OX15 4BY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Welcome to Sulgrave Manor & Garden. Built by the ancestors of George Washington and saved from ruin by donors from both the UK and USA, Sulgrave Manor is the original home of the Special Relationship. Steeped in history with a legacy that unites nations, be inspired by our stories and consider why working together is still important today.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New York City Fire Museum

278 Spring Street, New York, NY, US, 10013
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The New York City Fire Museum houses one of the nation's most important collections of fire related art and artifacts from the late 18th century to the present. Among its holdings are painted leather buckets, helmets, parade hats and belts, lanterns and tools, pre Civil War hand pumped fire engines, horse drawn vehicles and early motorized apparatus. Additionally, we are the first Museum to house a permanent exhibit to the 343 fallen heroes from September 11, 2001.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulgrave-manor.jpeg
Sulgrave Manor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-fire-museum.jpeg
New York City Fire Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sulgrave Manor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New York City Fire Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sulgrave Manor in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York City Fire Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Sulgrave Manor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sulgrave Manor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New York City Fire Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York City Fire Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulgrave-manor.jpeg
Sulgrave Manor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-fire-museum.jpeg
New York City Fire Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sulgrave Manor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York City Fire Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New York City Fire Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sulgrave Manor company.

In the current year, New York City Fire Museum company and Sulgrave Manor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New York City Fire Museum company nor Sulgrave Manor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New York City Fire Museum company nor Sulgrave Manor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New York City Fire Museum company nor Sulgrave Manor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor New York City Fire Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor New York City Fire Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sulgrave Manor company employs more people globally than New York City Fire Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sulgrave Manor nor New York City Fire Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X