Comparison Overview

Suffolk User Forum

VS

Woodland Centers - Minnesota

Suffolk User Forum

Unit 3, Grange Business Centre, Ipswich, IP5 2BY, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

We are an independent mental health user led, involvement, peer support and advocacy organisation. Listening and giving people a voice by opening up conversations about mental health and emotional wellbeing, is at the heart of our organisation. We do this by gathering peoples stories and providing a platform so their stories can be heard. We believe that peoples individual stories empower service user leadership which is essential to improve services and to make a difference to the experience of others. We report peoples’ experiences in our publication ‘Making Our Voice Count’ which is presented to strategic leaders, mental health providers and the Care Quality Commission, informing decision making. We work to ensure mental health care, suicide prevention and wellbeing support is accessible, high quality, supportive, compassionate, and fair. Built on listening to and understanding the lived experience, addressing health, discrimination, and social inequalities. By promoting and enabling meaningful involvement and coproduction between service users, family carers, commissioners, and providers, together we continue to make positive change happen. CW=Content warning where a post may contain distressing information e.g. mention of self harm of suicide.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Woodland Centers - Minnesota

1125 SE 6th Street, Willmar, MN, 56201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Let's talk about mental health. Really, let's talk it about. Anyone who experiences anxiety, depression or other mental illness knows, it’s not “all in your head.” Mental health problems can affect every aspect of your life. Your mood, energy, appetite, sleep, relationships with other people, your ability to function at work or school – even your physical health – can be affected by your mental health. Mental health problems are common. Fortunately, most are treatable. Woodland Centers is a community mental health center committed to delivering comprehensive, coordinated and affordable behavioral health care to children, adolescents and adults. Our expert team of psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and professional counselors is dedicated to providing innovative, personalized mental health care. For some, outpatient mental health means a weekly visit to a counselor to help cope with the break-up of a relationship. For others, it may be achieving recovery from depression through improved lifestyle management. For still others, it may mean consulting with a psychiatrist about medications to treat major mental illness A private, non-profit organization established in 1958, Woodland Centers was one of the first community health programs in Minnesota. Our team collaborates with medical care providers, schools, counties, courts, corrections and other professionals in our communities to ensure people of all ages and backgrounds receive the help they need. We offer a wide range of services including Psychiatry, Outpatient Therapy, School Linked Mental Health, Chemical Health Services, Crisis Services, Residential Programs, and Employee Assistance Programs. Ready to talk about mental health? We’re listening.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-user-forum.jpeg
Suffolk User Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodland-centers---minnesota.jpeg
Woodland Centers - Minnesota
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Suffolk User Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Woodland Centers - Minnesota
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suffolk User Forum in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woodland Centers - Minnesota in 2026.

Incident History — Suffolk User Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suffolk User Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Woodland Centers - Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woodland Centers - Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-user-forum.jpeg
Suffolk User Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodland-centers---minnesota.jpeg
Woodland Centers - Minnesota
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Woodland Centers - Minnesota company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Suffolk User Forum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Woodland Centers - Minnesota company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Suffolk User Forum company.

In the current year, Woodland Centers - Minnesota company and Suffolk User Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Woodland Centers - Minnesota company nor Suffolk User Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Woodland Centers - Minnesota company nor Suffolk User Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Woodland Centers - Minnesota company nor Suffolk User Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Suffolk User Forum company nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Suffolk User Forum company nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Woodland Centers - Minnesota company employs more people globally than Suffolk User Forum company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Suffolk User Forum nor Woodland Centers - Minnesota holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N