Comparison Overview

Success Rehabilitation

VS

Arbo Unie

Success Rehabilitation

5666 Clymer Rd, Quakertown, 18951, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

At Success Rehabilitation, now featuring our newest divisions, Community Skills Program® and Acadia NeuroRehab, we take pride in being a leading provider of post-acute brain rehabilitation programs and services. Spanning the continuum of post-acute care in brain injury rehabilitation, our comprehensive programs ensure an individualized and multidisciplinary team approach to rehabilitation - from Residential and Neuro Rehabilitation Outpatient Services to Home- and Community-Based Services.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arbo Unie

Nevelgaarde 42, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, NL, 3436 ZZ
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Arbo Unie is een groep gedreven professionals in de bedrijfsgezondheidszorg, die organisaties vooruit brengt. Wij helpen mensen een leven lang optimaal te laten werken. Op een gezonde, veilige en productieve manier, zodat ze al hun mogelijkheden ten volle kunnen benutten. Arbo Unie is er voor organisaties in Nederland, die deze filosofie delen en die willen investeren in mensen. Wij zijn een moderne, landelijke dienstverlener met een sterke regionale binding en werken voor meer dan 1,2 miljoen werkenden bij ruim 12.000 organisaties. Wij boeken resultaat in uiteenlopende branches, omdat wij geloven in een multidisciplinaire aanpak. Alle kennis hebben wij in eigen huis. En daarmee zetten we onze klanten op voorsprong.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 846
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/success-rehabilitation.jpeg
Success Rehabilitation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbo-unie.jpeg
Arbo Unie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Success Rehabilitation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arbo Unie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Success Rehabilitation in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arbo Unie in 2025.

Incident History — Success Rehabilitation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Success Rehabilitation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arbo Unie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arbo Unie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/success-rehabilitation.jpeg
Success Rehabilitation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbo-unie.jpeg
Arbo Unie
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arbo Unie company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Success Rehabilitation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arbo Unie company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Success Rehabilitation company.

In the current year, Arbo Unie company and Success Rehabilitation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arbo Unie company nor Success Rehabilitation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arbo Unie company nor Success Rehabilitation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arbo Unie company nor Success Rehabilitation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Success Rehabilitation company nor Arbo Unie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Success Rehabilitation company nor Arbo Unie company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Arbo Unie company employs more people globally than Success Rehabilitation company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Success Rehabilitation nor Arbo Unie holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H