Comparison Overview

SW&M LLP

VS

ThorpeLaw, P.A.

SW&M LLP

550 N. Brand Blvd., Glendale, California, 91203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

SW&M has unsurpassed expertise in meeting the specific needs of financial institutions, from credit unions to community banks, loan brokers to money service businesses. Our attorneys provide comprehensive transactional, regulatory, and governance counsel to financial institutions from $5 million to $30 billion in assets around the country, for every facet of their business. As a boutique practice, SW&M gives personalized attention and quick responses to every client and matter. Our commitment to the financial services industry enables us to help our clients navigate through today’s ever-changing regulatory and compliance trends with practical, business-minded solutions. Managing tough situations is one of our specialties—the first place you turn for quick, expert counsel in avoiding conflict and mitigating risk. When your institution finds itself in a conflict, SW&M will both advocate on your behalf and advise you about the benefits and risks of all the paths forward. We have the experience, connections, and resources to deliver the right solution to strategically manage any crisis. Attorneys at SW&M are licensed to practice law in California, Arizona, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington and can assist clients with a number of federal regulatory issues. An AV-rated law firm ranked in the top 1% of firms nationwide as rated by our peers, SW&M is known and respected in the legal and financial communities. The Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers designates SW&M as a law firm demonstrating the highest professional and ethical standards.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ThorpeLaw, P.A.

1228 E 7th Ave, Tampa, Florida, 33605, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At ThorpeLaw, P.A., our focus is on achieving the best possible outcome for our clients. We take the time to talk to our clients and learn what their goals are. Then we develop an action plan for reaching those goals. Whether it’s negotiating on behalf of our clients before litigation or taking a sexual harassment case to trial, our team will be there. We are ThorpeLaw, P.A.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/styskal-wiese-&-melchione-llp.jpeg
SW&M LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thorpe-&-thorpe-p-a-.jpeg
ThorpeLaw, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SW&M LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ThorpeLaw, P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SW&M LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ThorpeLaw, P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — SW&M LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SW&M LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ThorpeLaw, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ThorpeLaw, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/styskal-wiese-&-melchione-llp.jpeg
SW&M LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thorpe-&-thorpe-p-a-.jpeg
ThorpeLaw, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ThorpeLaw, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SW&M LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ThorpeLaw, P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SW&M LLP company.

In the current year, ThorpeLaw, P.A. company and SW&M LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ThorpeLaw, P.A. company nor SW&M LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ThorpeLaw, P.A. company nor SW&M LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ThorpeLaw, P.A. company nor SW&M LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SW&M LLP company nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SW&M LLP company nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SW&M LLP company employs more people globally than ThorpeLaw, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SW&M LLP nor ThorpeLaw, P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X