Comparison Overview

Stylorouge

VS

Iron Design

Stylorouge

High Street, Kent, undefined, ME18 6HX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Stylorouge is an independent creative consultancy with over 30 years experience in commercial media. We work in the areas of graphic design and art direction, advertising, film and television, photography and multimedia. Our priority is effective creative communication. We produce work which has personality, originality and integrity for a variety of industries, although our speciality has always been the music business.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Iron Design

120 N. Aurora St., Ithaca, 14850, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1993 in Ithaca, NY, Iron Design develops cohesive brand + web identities for small and mid-sized organizations. With a focus on establishing new brands and re-energizing mature ones, our work takes a long-term strategic approach to developing and enhancing our clients'​ business, with teams spanning brand & web strategy, identity & naming, packaging design and communications design. Iron is devoted to de-mystifying brand development. We passionately involve our clients in the process to create communications materials that rise above the sum of its parts. We're confident you'll see the proof in the results. We've earned our success the old fashioned way » hard work.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stylorouge.jpeg
Stylorouge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-design.jpeg
Iron Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stylorouge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iron Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stylorouge in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Design in 2025.

Incident History — Stylorouge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stylorouge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iron Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stylorouge.jpeg
Stylorouge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-design.jpeg
Iron Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Stylorouge company and Iron Design company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Iron Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stylorouge company.

In the current year, Iron Design company and Stylorouge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Iron Design company nor Stylorouge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Iron Design company nor Stylorouge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Iron Design company nor Stylorouge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stylorouge company nor Iron Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stylorouge company nor Iron Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Iron Design company employs more people globally than Stylorouge company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stylorouge nor Iron Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X