Comparison Overview

Stylist Magazine

VS

Seattle's Child

Stylist Magazine

26-34 Emerald Street, None, London, United Kingdom, GB, WC1N 3QA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Stylist is the UK’s leading media brand for women; talking to 5 million UK women a month and making up 40% of the women’s lifestyle sector. Our audience are the UK’s finest professional women – a demographic who we understand and represent better than any other publisher. Our mission? To support, uplift and entertain this audience with compelling content and life-enhancing experiences so that they always feel seen and heard. The award-winning Stylist magazine and stylist.co.uk sit at the heart of our portfolio, reaching 400K women in print and over 3million UK women online through non-stop, mobile-first content. Alongside them sits Stylist Loves, our lifestyle trends email brand; Strong Women, our strength-focused fitness brand; and The Drop, our e-commerce platform dedicated to thoughtful shopping and independent businesses. For global brands who want to talk authentically to our audience, our in-house Creative Agency Stylist Studios excels at translating brand objectives into innovative storytelling and engaging solutions.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seattle's Child

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Seattle's Child was the first local parenting publication in the country when it launched in 1979 and continues to be the industry leader. With our monthly magazine, special publications (Summer, Baby, Explore, School, Family Page), mobile responsive website and enewsletters, Seattle's Child is the guide to all topics relevant to parents and people who work with kids. We're interested in how parents make house a home, how families create community and what parents are talking about. We know there is no one way to be a good parent and seek to reflect real Puget Sound families and their broad range of parenting experiences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stylistmagazine.jpeg
Stylist Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle's-child.jpeg
Seattle's Child
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stylist Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seattle's Child
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stylist Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle's Child in 2025.

Incident History — Stylist Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stylist Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seattle's Child (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle's Child cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stylistmagazine.jpeg
Stylist Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle's-child.jpeg
Seattle's Child
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stylist Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seattle's Child company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seattle's Child company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stylist Magazine company.

In the current year, Seattle's Child company and Stylist Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seattle's Child company nor Stylist Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seattle's Child company nor Stylist Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seattle's Child company nor Stylist Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stylist Magazine company nor Seattle's Child company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stylist Magazine company nor Seattle's Child company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stylist Magazine nor Seattle's Child holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.