Comparison Overview

StyleFlip

VS

Consolidated Label Co.

StyleFlip

2443 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55403, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

StyleFlip offers custom skin decals for the most popular cell phones, including the Apple iPhone skins, Blackberry skins and Android skins, Along with the hottest MP3 Players & Laptops, including covers for the following Apple iPods, Zune, Apple Macbook Decals, Apple Macbook Pro Decals, Dell Decals, HP Decals. If you’re a gamer and you want your gaming system to be the coolest on the block then Styleflip’s has you covered from playstation & xbox skins, to guitar hero skins. StyleFlip manufactures only the highest quality covers. Our skin decals use 3M™ Controltac™ with Comply vinyl and feature a thin removable adhesive backing that contains patented air release channels to ensure easy bubble free application along with easy & damage free removal. StyleFlip cover skins prove to be the perfect accessory companion providing both personalization and protection for your gear.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Consolidated Label Co.

2001 East Lake Mary Blvd., Sanford, FL, 32773, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Consolidated Label Co., a division of Online Labels Group, is one of the country's leading suppliers of labels, shrink sleeves, and flexible packaging. We produce custom label products for thousands of customers across a variety of industries including food, beverage, household products, medical, pharmaceutical, and promotional products. Both digital printing presses and high-speed flexographic presses can be found in our plant which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/styleflip.jpeg
StyleFlip
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consolidated-label-co..jpeg
Consolidated Label Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
StyleFlip
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Consolidated Label Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for StyleFlip in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Consolidated Label Co. in 2025.

Incident History — StyleFlip (X = Date, Y = Severity)

StyleFlip cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Consolidated Label Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Consolidated Label Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/styleflip.jpeg
StyleFlip
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consolidated-label-co..jpeg
Consolidated Label Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

StyleFlip company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Consolidated Label Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Consolidated Label Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to StyleFlip company.

In the current year, Consolidated Label Co. company and StyleFlip company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. company nor StyleFlip company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. company nor StyleFlip company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. company nor StyleFlip company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither StyleFlip company nor Consolidated Label Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither StyleFlip company nor Consolidated Label Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Consolidated Label Co. company employs more people globally than StyleFlip company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither StyleFlip nor Consolidated Label Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N