Comparison Overview

Stylecraft

VS

Homes

Stylecraft

Level 24 , Woolloomooloo, NSW, 2011, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Stylecraft has been providing furniture of original, contemporary design for 70 years. First established in Melbourne, Australia in 1953 primarily as a commercial workstation provider, Stylecraft now has 7 showrooms around Australia and Asia, with over 20 exclusive European and Australian brands. Stylecraft is passionate about original design, investing in brands & people who share this passion. The Stylecraft culture is a sense of solutions based service and collaborative support to the design industry. Leading the industry, Stylecraft was the first commercial furniture company in Australia to become carbon neutral and now offers over 500 environmentally certified products.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Homes

1 Khalid ebn al waleed st, masaken sheraton, Cairo, 11841, EG
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Homes was created with you, the customer in mind. We stand firmly behind everything we sell. Whether we are combing the globe for the finest furnishings available or backing every sale with the best customer service in the industry, rest assured that we are committed to your complete satisfaction. At Homes, we understand that each of our customers is unique and has their own tastes when it comes to the decor for their home or office. That's why we work closely with you to understand your individual needs, whether its styles, fabrics or colors. Just pick up the phone and one of our knowledgeable associates will be more than happy to provide you with the best advice possible. And if there's something you don't see, ask. We have a network of some of the best manufacturers in the world and can usually find the perfect piece for you.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stylecraft.jpeg
Stylecraft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homes.jpeg
Homes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stylecraft
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Homes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stylecraft in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Homes in 2025.

Incident History — Stylecraft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stylecraft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Homes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Homes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stylecraft.jpeg
Stylecraft
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homes.jpeg
Homes
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Homes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stylecraft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Homes company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stylecraft company.

In the current year, Homes company and Stylecraft company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Homes company nor Stylecraft company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Homes company nor Stylecraft company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Homes company nor Stylecraft company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stylecraft company nor Homes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stylecraft company nor Homes company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stylecraft company employs more people globally than Homes company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stylecraft nor Homes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.