Comparison Overview

studioline Photography

VS

BackpagePix

studioline Photography

Andreas-Gayk Straße, Kiel, 24103, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL – studioline Photography setzt Dich in Szene. Bei uns erleben die Kunden ein echtes Blitzlichtgewitter und können sich wie ein Fotomodell fühlen. Das Ergebnis ist beeindruckend: fantastische Fotos zu fairen Preisen. Egal ob Business Bilder, Einzel- oder Gruppen-Portraits, privat oder geschäftlich: studioline Photography ist an über 80 Standorten in Deutschland mit seinen professionellen Fotografen vertreten.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 182
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BackpagePix

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

Backpagepix was created as a Photographic Agency in 2001. Backpagepix has developed into a media syndication agency, which has dominated football sponsorships in South Africa’s growing football industry and is contracted to nearly 80 percent of professional football sponsorships in South Africa through PR Companies and Marketing Agencies aligned to the various sponsorships. Over the past two years Backpagepix has taken its successful media syndication package into to other major and minor sporting codes.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studioline-photography.jpeg
studioline Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/backpagepix.jpeg
BackpagePix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
studioline Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BackpagePix
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for studioline Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BackpagePix in 2025.

Incident History — studioline Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

studioline Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BackpagePix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BackpagePix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studioline-photography.jpeg
studioline Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/backpagepix.jpeg
BackpagePix
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BackpagePix company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to studioline Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BackpagePix company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to studioline Photography company.

In the current year, BackpagePix company and studioline Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BackpagePix company nor studioline Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BackpagePix company nor studioline Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BackpagePix company nor studioline Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither studioline Photography company nor BackpagePix company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

studioline Photography company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BackpagePix company.

studioline Photography company employs more people globally than BackpagePix company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds HIPAA certification.

Neither studioline Photography nor BackpagePix holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N