Comparison Overview

Studio SMW

VS

Colorado Photographic Arts Center

Studio SMW

4612 Colonial Ave., Norfolk, Virginia, 23508, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Studio SMW is your place for all your Photography needs. Photographer Scott Wertz of Studio SMW located in Norfolk Virginia specializes in Architectural, Portrait and Corporate photography. I have worked in the Architectural Industry as an Architectural Illustrator for more than 20 years. Those years of experience have trained my eye in composition and light better my photography.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Colorado Photographic Arts Center

1200 Lincoln Street, Denver, 80203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Mission: As a non-profit, CPAC is dedicated to fostering the understanding and appreciation of excellent photography in all forms and concepts through exhibitions, education and community outreach. CPAC benefits the Mountain West region’s photographic community by nurturing new talent, expanding concepts, generating skills, piquing interest, and contributing to a sustainable market for collectors and artists. CPAC is supported by the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District, Bonfils Stanton Foundation, and by funding from the Colorado Creative Industries Division, a state agency, and the National Endowment for the Arts, a federal agency.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-smw.jpeg
Studio SMW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-photographic-arts-center.jpeg
Colorado Photographic Arts Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio SMW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colorado Photographic Arts Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio SMW in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Photographic Arts Center in 2025.

Incident History — Studio SMW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio SMW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colorado Photographic Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Photographic Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-smw.jpeg
Studio SMW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-photographic-arts-center.jpeg
Colorado Photographic Arts Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Studio SMW company and Colorado Photographic Arts Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Colorado Photographic Arts Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio SMW company.

In the current year, Colorado Photographic Arts Center company and Studio SMW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center company nor Studio SMW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center company nor Studio SMW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center company nor Studio SMW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio SMW company nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Studio SMW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Colorado Photographic Arts Center company.

Colorado Photographic Arts Center company employs more people globally than Studio SMW company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio SMW nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N