Comparison Overview

Studio P+P

VS

Studio Mark5

Studio P+P

Blackfriars Road, London, London, SE18EQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Studio P+P - Polina Dyer is a London-based designer with over ten year’s experience in creative direction, visual identity developing and branding for different scales of businesses. Created to drive businesses connected with the ‘high-end market’- Real Estate, Fashion, Beauty, Culture, Design and Art. Polina enjoys working on a diversity of projects and sees challenges as a force for growth. Polina creates intelligent design solutions, which reflect each clients’ personality, be it experimental or minimal. This is achieved using an accurate, methodical approach with every aspect of the project in mind.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio Mark5

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Studio Mark5 (SM5) is a Design & Illustration Studio created by Mark Jamotillo (Mark5) and is currently based in San Diego, CA. We work with Logos & Typography, but also design Apparel, Music Posters, and Skateboard Graphics. Mark5 has been involved with the apparel industry for over 10 years, primarily T-shirt graphics. Studio Mark5 is in its second year of business, so we’re excited to meet and collaborate with other artists & companies that influence us. Our primary goal is simple – to work hard, smart, and get better at what we do. We’re always inspired by our creative peers, but we also seek inspiration through traveling experiences. Most importantly, we’re here to stay passionate and enjoy what we do.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-pplusp.jpeg
Studio P+P
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-mark5.jpeg
Studio Mark5
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio P+P
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio Mark5
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio P+P in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio Mark5 in 2025.

Incident History — Studio P+P (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio P+P cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio Mark5 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio Mark5 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-pplusp.jpeg
Studio P+P
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-mark5.jpeg
Studio Mark5
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio Mark5 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio P+P company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio Mark5 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio P+P company.

In the current year, Studio Mark5 company and Studio P+P company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio Mark5 company nor Studio P+P company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio Mark5 company nor Studio P+P company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio Mark5 company nor Studio P+P company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio P+P company nor Studio Mark5 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studio P+P company nor Studio Mark5 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio Mark5 company employs more people globally than Studio P+P company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio P+P nor Studio Mark5 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X