Comparison Overview

Studio For Change, PC

VS

United Support Services

Studio For Change, PC

2801 N. Sheffield, Chicago, IL, 60657, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

The Studio For Change® is a small group private practice offering mental health services to adults, teens, children, couples, and families. Our mission is to reduce the stigma associated with seeking therapeutic support by providing a warm, comfortable and nurturing environment for our clients. The Studio For Change® is comprised of a small group of licensed social workers, counselors, and psychologists who are highly skilled in supporting clients to determine their next best steps in life. Each of our therapists brings a unique set of skills and clinical experiences to the table, allowing for a strong collaborative team and the ability to pair each client with the therapist who will best meet that client's needs. The Studio For Change® offers a unique integration of professional guidance and resources, which are designed to help clients improve their overall well-being, reach significant self-selected life goals, and flourish. We are now accepting new clients. The Studio For Change® accepts Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

United Support Services

3959 Electric Road, Ste. 345, Roanoke, Virginia, 24018, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

United Support Services believes that helping those in need of mental health services is productive not only to the individual, but to the community as well. Helping client’s maintain independence and stability in their homes, schools and communities is our mission. Our motto: “People Helping People” emphasizes the structure and goal of the company. By providing skills training in the areas of independent living and therapeutic intervention, our clients will be able to achieve and maintain their independence and stability in their homes, schools and communities. Mental Health Skill Building Services Therapeutic Day Treatment Program *Therapeutic Day Treatment Services are provided at the following Roanoke City Public Schools: *Fallon Park Elementary School *Fishburn Park Elementary School *Morningside Elementary School *Stonewall Jackson Middle School Bedford County Schools: *Bedford Alternative Education Center *Bedford Elementary School *Bedford Primary School *Goodview Elementary School *Staunton River Middle School *Staunton River High School *Stewartsville Elementary School Intensive In-Home Services Out-patient Psychiatric & Substance Abuse Counseling *Licensure Supervision Available Licensed by Virginia Department of Behavioral Health & Devlopemental Services (DBHDS) *Accepting referrals for all programs in Roanoke, the New River Valley, City of Martinsville, City of Danville, City of Bedford, City of Lynchburg, Amherst, Appomattox, Bedford, Henry, Franklin, Montgomery, Pulaski, Patrick, Campbell and Pittsylvania Counties

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-for-change-pc.jpeg
Studio For Change, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-support-services.jpeg
United Support Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio For Change, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United Support Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio For Change, PC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Support Services in 2026.

Incident History — Studio For Change, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio For Change, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-for-change-pc.jpeg
Studio For Change, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-support-services.jpeg
United Support Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Support Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio For Change, PC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, United Support Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio For Change, PC company.

In the current year, United Support Services company and Studio For Change, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither United Support Services company nor Studio For Change, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither United Support Services company nor Studio For Change, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither United Support Services company nor Studio For Change, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio For Change, PC company nor United Support Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studio For Change, PC company nor United Support Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United Support Services company employs more people globally than Studio For Change, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio For Change, PC nor United Support Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N