Comparison Overview

Studio des formes

VS

opixido

Studio des formes

6, Rue d'aboukir, None, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75002
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Des formes is a creative studio founded in 2014 by Alban Leven, Gaël Gouault and Valentin Robinet based in Paris. Studio des formes develops a conceptual approach based on exchange and dialogue to design original visual solutions adapted to each request. Des formes works in artistic direction, graphic design, webdesign, UX/UI design, editorial design, motion design and signage fields for culture and commerce. Feel free to contact for project inquiries.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

opixido

42, Rue Alexandre Dumas, Paris, 75011, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Opixido, c’est avant tout une équipe de créatifs, curieux du contenu et passionnés partageant la même envie de vous offrir une communication sensible, audacieuse et pertinente. Vingt-deux ans après sa création, Opixido fait partie des acteurs majeurs en matière de création multimédia et de communication à vocation culturelle. Nous sommes fiers de travailler avec de nombreux établissements muséaux, institutionnels et culturels, implantés sur tout le territoire. Nous concevons et réalisons des supports de communication attractifs, forts, en adéquation avec cette volonté de démocratisation des connaissances.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-des-formes.jpeg
Studio des formes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opixido.jpeg
opixido
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio des formes
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
opixido
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio des formes in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for opixido in 2025.

Incident History — Studio des formes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio des formes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — opixido (X = Date, Y = Severity)

opixido cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-des-formes.jpeg
Studio des formes
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opixido.jpeg
opixido
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

opixido company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio des formes company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, opixido company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio des formes company.

In the current year, opixido company and Studio des formes company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither opixido company nor Studio des formes company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither opixido company nor Studio des formes company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither opixido company nor Studio des formes company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio des formes company nor opixido company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studio des formes company nor opixido company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

opixido company employs more people globally than Studio des formes company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio des formes nor opixido holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X