Comparison Overview

studio b home

VS

Geek Chic

studio b home

380 King St E, Toronto, M5A 1K9, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

studio b offers luxury designer furniture  for the home in Toronto and around the globe. Founded in 1999 by David Beaton, studio b believes in choosing furniture well, rather than often. studio b represents numerous designer brands including Holly Hunt, Walter Knoll, Baker, Hastens, DEDON and Paula Lenti. Luxury and exceptional customer service is our mandate. Visit the showroom in downtown Toronto to experience exceptional designer furniture, supporting both the residential and commercial markets.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Geek Chic

711 100th St SE, Everett, 98208-3727, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Geek Chic has been making lifestyle furniture for geeks since 2008-- starting with gaming tables, and expanding into other geek needs like comic storage, collectibles display, and office retrofitting. Each heirloom quality piece is handcrafted by a small team of dedicated woodworkers in a shop just north of Seattle, WA. True to their name, Geek Chic aims to design, shape, and elevate the geek praxis.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-b-home-inc.jpeg
studio b home
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geek-chic.jpeg
Geek Chic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
studio b home
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Geek Chic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for studio b home in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geek Chic in 2025.

Incident History — studio b home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

studio b home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Geek Chic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geek Chic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-b-home-inc.jpeg
studio b home
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geek-chic.jpeg
Geek Chic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Geek Chic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to studio b home company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Geek Chic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to studio b home company.

In the current year, Geek Chic company and studio b home company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Geek Chic company nor studio b home company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Geek Chic company nor studio b home company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Geek Chic company nor studio b home company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither studio b home company nor Geek Chic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither studio b home company nor Geek Chic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Geek Chic company employs more people globally than studio b home company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither studio b home nor Geek Chic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.