Comparison Overview

Studio 361

VS

KT Designs

Studio 361

via B. Montagna, 5, Brescia, 25124, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Studio 361 nasce nel 2007 da un’idea di Michela Di Stefano, AdobeGuru dal 2004 con ventennale esperienza nel campo del Desktop Publishing, per rispondere in modo puntuale alle esigenze di orientamento nel mondo della comunicazione della piccola media impresa (PMI). Si tratta si una realtà professionale costituita da un Network di professionisti, altamente specializzati, che collaborano in sinergia e mettono a disposizione la loro professionalità nell’ambito della comunicazione d’impresa e della creatività. Le attività sviluppate dal network si rivolgono ad Aziende, agenzie di comunicazione, tipografie ed Istituti di formazione, ma anche a strutture che organizzano eventi specifici nei settori della formazione professionale su prodotti Adobe Creative Suite, consulenza web, progettazione e consulenza grafica, editoria sia cartacea che digitale e realizzazione di applicazioni per tablets e smartphones, sia in ambiente iOS che Android.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KT Designs

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

A fresh freelance graphic designer. Dedicated to new, innovative graphic styles. From logo design to print advertising. Equine photography and ad design. Also am proficient at photo re-touching, collage's and creating special memories. Affiliate member for the innovators of the "floater". The new ingenious way to display your photos, or photo creations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-361.jpeg
Studio 361
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kt-designs.jpeg
KT Designs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio 361
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KT Designs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 361 in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KT Designs in 2025.

Incident History — Studio 361 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 361 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KT Designs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KT Designs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-361.jpeg
Studio 361
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kt-designs.jpeg
KT Designs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KT Designs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio 361 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KT Designs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio 361 company.

In the current year, KT Designs company and Studio 361 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KT Designs company nor Studio 361 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KT Designs company nor Studio 361 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KT Designs company nor Studio 361 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio 361 company nor KT Designs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studio 361 company nor KT Designs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio 361 company employs more people globally than KT Designs company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio 361 nor KT Designs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X