Comparison Overview

Studio 1

VS

Hole Punch Design

Studio 1

Last Update: 2025-12-01

Elly Honig, grafisch ontwerper, beeldend kunstenaar en fotografe. Haar opleiding heeft ze genoten aan de Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam, richting grafisch ontwerpen met als extra vak fotografie. Zij heeft na haar opleiding 13 jaar gewerkt bij Eden (BRS Premsela Vonk) en Total Design en heeft zich gespecialiseerd in het maken van formulieren. Na deze periode was zij toe aan een ommezwaai en heeft haar werkgevers vaarwel gezegd. Ze heeft zich toen vrij gevestigd. Studio 1 bestaat ruim 10 jaar. Naast formulieren maakt ze van ieder soort opdracht een succes. U mag bij haar aankloppen voor zowel een kerstkaart als een web-site. In de afgelopen 10 jaar heeft zij zich ook toegelegd op de beeldende kunst. Na de voorgaande periode als hoofd van het gezin met baan en puberkinderen kwam er rust en kon zij zich toeleggen op haar passie, het creëren van kunst. Inmiddels heeft ze een paar exposities achter de rug en is ze in 2008 kunstenaarslid geworden bij Arti et Amicitiae met grafisch werk en foto's.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hole Punch Design

4420 Los Feliz Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90027, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

At Hole Punch Design our passion is putting words and images to work to help you succeed. We combine beauty and efficiency to shine a light on all you have to offer. No campaign is too large, no project too small. Every client’s needs are different, and our nimble and personalized approach ensures each project is tailored to your vision. We are proud to work with people and businesses that help our community thrive.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-1.jpeg
Studio 1
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hole-punch-design.jpeg
Hole Punch Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio 1
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hole Punch Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 1 in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hole Punch Design in 2025.

Incident History — Studio 1 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 1 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hole Punch Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hole Punch Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-1.jpeg
Studio 1
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hole-punch-design.jpeg
Hole Punch Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio 1 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hole Punch Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hole Punch Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio 1 company.

In the current year, Hole Punch Design company and Studio 1 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hole Punch Design company nor Studio 1 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hole Punch Design company nor Studio 1 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hole Punch Design company nor Studio 1 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio 1 company nor Hole Punch Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studio 1 company nor Hole Punch Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hole Punch Design company employs more people globally than Studio 1 company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio 1 nor Hole Punch Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X