Comparison Overview

Studies Weekly

VS

Read How You Want

Studies Weekly

1430 W 1140 N, Orem, UT, 84057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Studies Weekly’s K-6 educational materials enable teachers to focus on where educators make the greatest impact of all: students. In 1984 when 4th-grade teacher Paul Thompson found no state history textbook to use in his class; he decided to write a state history "textbook"​ in a weekly magazine format, and Studies Weekly was born.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 227
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Read How You Want

241 Commonwealth St, Surry Hills, 2010, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Read How You Want is an Australian-based company that partners with publishers to provide content in a full range of alternative formats. The company’s proprietary patent-pending technology provides an efficient means of converting texts into many large print formats, Braille, DAISY, e-books, specialised formats for readers with disabilities, and reader-personalised print formats. The company provides sales channel support and distribution through both Amazon and the company’s website. Read How You Want provides publishers with a turnkey solution for complying with the requirements of disability discrimination legislation and the changing demographics and expectations of readers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studies-weekly.jpeg
Studies Weekly
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/readhowyouwant.jpeg
Read How You Want
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studies Weekly
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Read How You Want
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studies Weekly in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Read How You Want in 2025.

Incident History — Studies Weekly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studies Weekly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Read How You Want (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Read How You Want cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studies-weekly.jpeg
Studies Weekly
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/readhowyouwant.jpeg
Read How You Want
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studies Weekly company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Read How You Want company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Read How You Want company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studies Weekly company.

In the current year, Read How You Want company and Studies Weekly company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Read How You Want company nor Studies Weekly company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Read How You Want company nor Studies Weekly company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Read How You Want company nor Studies Weekly company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studies Weekly company nor Read How You Want company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studies Weekly company nor Read How You Want company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studies Weekly company employs more people globally than Read How You Want company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studies Weekly nor Read How You Want holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.