Comparison Overview

StubHub

VS

Pitney Bowes

StubHub

None, None, New York, NY, US, 10007
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

At StubHub, our mission is to give everyone the freedom to access and connect through live experiences. As the world's leading live event marketplace, we connect fans, sellers, and partners globally, providing access to an expansive catalog of events across more than 90 countries and territories. In 2024 alone, fans purchased over 40 million tickets from more than 1 million unique sellers on our marketplace. Operating in 33 languages and offering transactions in 48 currencies, StubHub ensures that fans everywhere can discover and attend events seamlessly, no matter their location. From sports and music to comedy, dance, festivals, and theater, we enable fans to access unforgettable experiences worldwide. Our trusted and secure platform guarantees a zero-breakage ticket-buying experience, supported by advanced pricing intelligence for fair and transparent ticketing. StubHub is redefining live entertainment through consumer-focused products, omnichannel marketing excellence, and unparalleled global selection. Ready to shape the future of live entertainment?

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,653
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Pitney Bowes

3001 Summer Street, None, Stamford, CT, US, 06926
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven products and services company that provides SaaS shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entities rely on Pitney Bowes to reduce the complexity of sending mail and parcels. For additional information, visit Pitney Bowes at www.pitneybowes.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,875
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stubhub.jpeg
StubHub
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pitney-bowes.jpeg
Pitney Bowes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
StubHub
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pitney Bowes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

StubHub has 132.56% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pitney Bowes in 2025.

Incident History — StubHub (X = Date, Y = Severity)

StubHub cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stubhub.jpeg
StubHub
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Backdoor
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pitney-bowes.jpeg
Pitney Bowes
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pitney Bowes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to StubHub company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pitney Bowes company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to StubHub company.

In the current year, StubHub company has reported more cyber incidents than Pitney Bowes company.

Pitney Bowes company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while StubHub company has not reported such incidents publicly.

StubHub company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Pitney Bowes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pitney Bowes company nor StubHub company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither StubHub company nor Pitney Bowes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pitney Bowes company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to StubHub company.

Pitney Bowes company employs more people globally than StubHub company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither StubHub nor Pitney Bowes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X