Comparison Overview

Strukton Rail

VS

CAD Railway Industries Ltd.

Strukton Rail

Westkanaaldijk 2, Utrecht, Utrecht, 3542 DA, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Our goal is to make rail transport a competitive option by offering attractive rail solutions. We do so with groundbreaking solutions in the field of rail infrastructure and rolling stock. We operate in various countries worldwide from our home countries the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Italy and Belgium, and our entity countries Australia and the US.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 1,183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CAD Railway Industries Ltd.

155 Montreal-Toronto Highway, Lachine, Québec, H8S 1B4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

CAD Railway Industries: Leading the Future of Rail Transportation === With over 45 years of excellence, CAD Railway Industries has established itself as a leader in the rail sector. Based in Lachine, Quebec, we specialize in delivering comprehensive repair and refurbishment services for locomotives, freight cars, passenger cars, and diesel engines. Our work ensures long-lasting performance, extending the life of rail assets by up to 20 years. CAD has grown and expanded its business from coast to coast in the past decade. In 2017, CAD strengthened its national reach by acquiring Calgary-based Caltrax Inc., Western Canada’s only independent rail repair services provider with already 3 locations. In 2020, CAD Rail reached a 23-Year agreement for Rail Fleet Maintenance with ONxpress Operations Inc, solidifying its expertise in rolling stock repair capabilities. With 450 skilled employees and facilities strategically located across Canada, CAD Railway Industries is your trusted partner in maintaining rail transportation's safety, efficiency, and sustainability—keeping the industry on track for the future.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 345
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strukton-rail.jpeg
Strukton Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cad-railway-industries-ltd..jpeg
CAD Railway Industries Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strukton Rail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CAD Railway Industries Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strukton Rail in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAD Railway Industries Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Strukton Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strukton Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CAD Railway Industries Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAD Railway Industries Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strukton-rail.jpeg
Strukton Rail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cad-railway-industries-ltd..jpeg
CAD Railway Industries Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Strukton Rail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strukton Rail company.

In the current year, CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company and Strukton Rail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company nor Strukton Rail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company nor Strukton Rail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company nor Strukton Rail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strukton Rail company nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strukton Rail company nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Strukton Rail company employs more people globally than CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strukton Rail nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H