Comparison Overview

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP

VS

Legal Graphicworks

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP

80 Pine Street, New York, 10005, US
Last Update: 2026-03-19
Between 700 and 749

The law firm of STRONGIN ROTHMAN & ABRAMS, LLP, established in 1999, is a full service civil litigation firm providing personalized representation to corporations and individuals, with a concentration in tort, commercial and employment law. The firm has offices at 80 Pine Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10005, and at 70 South Orange Avenue, Suite 215, Livingston, NJ 07039.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Graphicworks

2475 Mercer Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL, 33401, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Legal Graphicworks is a premier boutique litigation and trial support firm consistently exceeding clients’ expectations through unparalleled attention to detail, superior customer service, multimedia demonstrative aids and the ability to refine complex information into a simple, compelling story. The team at Legal Graphicworks are experts in effective, persuasive communications and mediation and courtroom presentations, such as state-of-the-art animation, Powerpoint demonstrations, compelling settlement documentaries, dynamic graphics and accurate medical illustrations. With offices in West Palm Beach, Florida, New Orleans, Louisiana and Orlando, Florida and national trusted partners, Legal Graphicworks is able to support your video (depositions, designations, editing), presentations, trial graphics and trial technician needs throughout the U.S. Legal Graphicworks offers unmatched technical experience in the use of the best trial presentation software (Trial Director, OnCue) and equipment for all of your trial technology requirements. The team at Legal Graphicworks can assist in preparing your next deposition, hearing, arbitration, mediation, settlement conference, bench trial or jury trial. Preparing for a case? Call us at 561-655-0678 or e-mail us at [email protected] "For a winning case, take us to court!"​

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strongin-rothman-&-abrams-llp.jpeg
Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Graphicworks
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Graphicworks in 2026.

Incident History — Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Graphicworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Graphicworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strongin-rothman-&-abrams-llp.jpeg
Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-graphicworks.jpeg
Legal Graphicworks
Incidents

FAQ

Legal Graphicworks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legal Graphicworks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company.

In the current year, Legal Graphicworks company and Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Graphicworks company nor Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Graphicworks company nor Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Graphicworks company nor Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company nor Legal Graphicworks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company nor Legal Graphicworks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Graphicworks company employs more people globally than Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Legal Graphicworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H