Comparison Overview

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP

VS

Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A.

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP

80 Pine Street, New York, 10005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The law firm of STRONGIN ROTHMAN & ABRAMS, LLP, established in 1999, is a full service civil litigation firm providing personalized representation to corporations and individuals, with a concentration in tort, commercial and employment law. The firm has offices at 80 Pine Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10005, and at 70 South Orange Avenue, Suite 215, Livingston, NJ 07039.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A.

100 S. Ashley Drive, Tampa, Florida, 33602, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Stanton IP Law Firm focuses on protecting, enforcing, and monetizing Intellectual Property rights for their clients by obtaining patents both in the US and abroad, trademarks at both the federal and state levels, copyrights on works of art, and keeping trade secrets confidential. Founded by Thomas H. Stanton, Stanton IP Law Firm leverages over 15 years in the technology industry to revolutionize the traditional law firm model in order to deliver results oriented, client centric representation to clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies. At Stanton IP Law Firm, we focus on protecting, enforcing, and monetizing your Intellectual Property rights. We can assist you in obtaining patents both in the US and abroad, trademarks at both the federal and state levels, copyrights on your works of art, and keeping your trade secrets confidential. Having many years of experience in both the startup and high-tech sectors, we bring a unique perspective to our clients. One that focuses not just on the legal aspect of the solution, but also the business impact and the overall effect on the organization. This can include software development agreements, licensing contracts, service level agreements, cloud computing agreements, and other technology related agreements for our clients. While we have a strong focus on the high-tech sector, we also have skillsets in a variety of other areas including mechanical, chemical, biotechnology, and electrical. Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. has locations in Tampa, New Yor, Washington DC and Boston, MA. Contact us today!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strongin-rothman-&-abrams-llp.jpeg
Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stantoniplaw.jpeg
Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strongin-rothman-&-abrams-llp.jpeg
Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stantoniplaw.jpeg
Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company.

In the current year, Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company and Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company nor Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company nor Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company nor Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP company employs more people globally than Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strongin Rothman & Abrams, LLP nor Stanton IP Law Firm, P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X