Comparison Overview

Strong Studio

VS

Traveling Dragon Studio

Strong Studio

222 Broadway, New York, New York, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Strong Studio is a full-service design agency that has been building brands with character since 2006. From branding to packaging, we flex both sides of the brain to craft thoughtful, creative solutions that raise the bar. Branding • Brand Guidelines • Copywriting • Naming • Positioning • Research • Social Media • Visual Identity • Voice + Tone Print • Advertising • Annual Reports • Brochure • Business Papers • Editorial • Invitations • Presentations • Stationery Dimensional • Environmental • Gala Events • Package Design • Product Design • Schematics • Signage • Trade Shows • Way-finding Digital • Animation • E-Commerce • Front End Dev • Interactive Design • Motion • UI + UX Design • Web Banners • Web Design

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Traveling Dragon Studio

Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

My Mission: to create imaginatively truthful and inclusive illustration, especially for children’s books & media; to lead mural projects that build community and celebrate diverse cultures; and to lead art classes, retreats, and coaching sessions that promote exploration & self-acceptance for my students/clients, that unleashes their inner magic, empowering them to stand strong in their authentic selves.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strong-studio-nyc-llc.jpeg
Strong Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magic-hand-studio.jpeg
Traveling Dragon Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strong Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Traveling Dragon Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strong Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Traveling Dragon Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Strong Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strong Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Traveling Dragon Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Traveling Dragon Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strong-studio-nyc-llc.jpeg
Strong Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magic-hand-studio.jpeg
Traveling Dragon Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Traveling Dragon Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Strong Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Traveling Dragon Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strong Studio company.

In the current year, Traveling Dragon Studio company and Strong Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Traveling Dragon Studio company nor Strong Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Traveling Dragon Studio company nor Strong Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Traveling Dragon Studio company nor Strong Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strong Studio company nor Traveling Dragon Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strong Studio company nor Traveling Dragon Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Strong Studio company employs more people globally than Traveling Dragon Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strong Studio nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X