Comparison Overview

Strix Technology Group

VS

Parallel Ltd

Strix Technology Group

909 Baltimore Blvd, 127, Westminster, Maryland, US, 21157
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Providing technology solutions to small and medium businesses in the mid-atlantic region. A privately held Maryland corporation, TSSI was formed in 1994 by Timothy Niles to perform systems integration and consulting services for small to medium size businesses. We provide services tailored to the needs of each client, not a “one size fits all” approach. Our goal is not to force our client to change to meet our approach, but to adjust our methods to meet the unique business needs of each organization. We maintain the highest quality of work in a professional and competent manner. Our goal is to remove technology as a barrier to the success of your business. We act as your advocate and partner to help you achieve more, produce more and help increase your bottom line.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Parallel Ltd

GB, mk43 0bt
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

A subsidiary of iDirect UK Ltd and VT Systems responsible for development of SatManage. SatManage is a sophisticated suite of Web-based software tools for automation, monitoring and integration of hybrid networks and NOC based applications. SatManage is a powerful extension to iDirect’s iVantage NMS, taking NOC operations to an even higher standard of network performance and scalability. Featuring a powerful range of Web-based tools, SatManage enables service providers to improve overall service quality and network operations.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Strix Technology Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Parallel Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strix Technology Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Parallel Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strix Technology Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parallel Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Strix Technology Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strix Technology Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Parallel Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parallel Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Strix Technology Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Parallel Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Strix Technology Group company and Parallel Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Parallel Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strix Technology Group company.

In the current year, Parallel Ltd company and Strix Technology Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Parallel Ltd company nor Strix Technology Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Parallel Ltd company nor Strix Technology Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Parallel Ltd company nor Strix Technology Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strix Technology Group company nor Parallel Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strix Technology Group company nor Parallel Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Strix Technology Group company employs more people globally than Parallel Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor Parallel Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.