Comparison Overview

Strix Technology Group

VS

MDSA

Strix Technology Group

909 Baltimore Blvd, 127, Westminster, Maryland, US, 21157
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Providing technology solutions to small and medium businesses in the mid-atlantic region. A privately held Maryland corporation, TSSI was formed in 1994 by Timothy Niles to perform systems integration and consulting services for small to medium size businesses. We provide services tailored to the needs of each client, not a “one size fits all” approach. Our goal is not to force our client to change to meet our approach, but to adjust our methods to meet the unique business needs of each organization. We maintain the highest quality of work in a professional and competent manner. Our goal is to remove technology as a barrier to the success of your business. We act as your advocate and partner to help you achieve more, produce more and help increase your bottom line.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MDSA

11511, SA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

Established in 1967, MDS Holding group of companies gave rise to MDS - Arabia Ltd. Servicing emerging markets of the Middle East and Central Asia. Providing professional and certified turnkey solutions for: Enterprise & Fault Tolerant Computer Solutions. Networking: LAN, WAN, Security, WLAN, … Structured Cabling Systems. S/W for Financial, Maintenance, Healthcare, etc.. Site Preparation Electro-Mechanical systems (UPS, Precision A/C, Frequency Converters, Raised Floors, Chargers and Batteries, Fire Alarms , Fire Protection etc..). Power generation, Transmission and Distribution. Hospitality Systems (POS, access cards, etc…).

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Strix Technology Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mdsa.jpeg
MDSA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strix Technology Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MDSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strix Technology Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MDSA in 2025.

Incident History — Strix Technology Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strix Technology Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MDSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MDSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Strix Technology Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mdsa.jpeg
MDSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MDSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Strix Technology Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MDSA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strix Technology Group company.

In the current year, MDSA company and Strix Technology Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MDSA company nor Strix Technology Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MDSA company nor Strix Technology Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MDSA company nor Strix Technology Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strix Technology Group company nor MDSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MDSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Strix Technology Group company.

MDSA company employs more people globally than Strix Technology Group company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strix Technology Group nor MDSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.