Comparison Overview

Street Tennis Inc.

VS

Tour Greens

Street Tennis Inc.

20038 Lakeshore, Baie D'Urfe, Quebec H9X1P3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Street Tennis Inc. is an international company that manufactures and sells the original Street Tennis™ Kit. Street Tennis™ was conceived and designed to make playing tennis fun and accessible for anyone and everyone. Street Tennis kits come complete with a net system, rackets, a durable carry bag and balls. The remarkable Street Tennis™ balls behave just like a traditional tennis ball but a little slower and they make it possible to play tennis on any flat surface including grass. Street Tennis™ set up in minutes and is great for recreational play or as an instructional tool. We like to say that "with Street Tennis™ Beginners Play and Players Compete!"​

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tour Greens

205 Boring Dr, Dalton, 30721, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Tour Greens is the premier designer and installer of tour quality synthetic golf greens. Tour Greens putting green systems provide a revolutionary short game practice area that reacts like a real bent grass green, without the daily maintenance. Tour Greens is the choice of numerous PGA Tour professionals because the greens provide the realistic feedback they need for quality practice time. Simply put, Tour Greens Short Game greens are the most attractive, highest-performing golf practice surfaces available anywhere.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/street-tennis-inc..jpeg
Street Tennis Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tour-greens-usa.jpeg
Tour Greens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Street Tennis Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tour Greens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Street Tennis Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tour Greens in 2025.

Incident History — Street Tennis Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Street Tennis Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tour Greens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tour Greens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/street-tennis-inc..jpeg
Street Tennis Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tour-greens-usa.jpeg
Tour Greens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Street Tennis Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tour Greens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tour Greens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Street Tennis Inc. company.

In the current year, Tour Greens company and Street Tennis Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tour Greens company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tour Greens company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tour Greens company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. company nor Tour Greens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tour Greens company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Street Tennis Inc. company.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Tour Greens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H