Comparison Overview

Street Tennis Inc.

VS

Gear Coop

Street Tennis Inc.

20038 Lakeshore, Baie D'Urfe, Quebec H9X1P3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Street Tennis Inc. is an international company that manufactures and sells the original Street Tennis™ Kit. Street Tennis™ was conceived and designed to make playing tennis fun and accessible for anyone and everyone. Street Tennis kits come complete with a net system, rackets, a durable carry bag and balls. The remarkable Street Tennis™ balls behave just like a traditional tennis ball but a little slower and they make it possible to play tennis on any flat surface including grass. Street Tennis™ set up in minutes and is great for recreational play or as an instructional tool. We like to say that "with Street Tennis™ Beginners Play and Players Compete!"​

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gear Coop

1420 Village Way, Santa Ana, 92705, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Established in 2009 in Costa Mesa, California, Gear Coop is an outdoor retailer known for their “triple guarantee”—free return shipping, free 2-day shipping, and a lifetime guarantee on all products—which is totally unique within the outdoor industry. Hearkening back to their roots as a climbing shop, Gear Coop prides itself on its extensive variety of climbing gear, with over 100 models of climbing shoes plus harnesses, carabiners, and sport and trad gear always in stock. However, Gear Coop and its team of “GearCoopers” strive to outfit everyone who loves being outdoors. From backpacking to backcountry snowsports, they stock top brands including Arc’teryx, adidas Outdoor, The North Face, Mountain Hardwear, La Sportiva, Black Diamond, GoPro, and countless others. Shop and get more information at www.gearcoop.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/street-tennis-inc..jpeg
Street Tennis Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gear-co-op.jpeg
Gear Coop
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Street Tennis Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gear Coop
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Street Tennis Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gear Coop in 2025.

Incident History — Street Tennis Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Street Tennis Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gear Coop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gear Coop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/street-tennis-inc..jpeg
Street Tennis Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gear-co-op.jpeg
Gear Coop
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Street Tennis Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gear Coop company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gear Coop company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Street Tennis Inc. company.

In the current year, Gear Coop company and Street Tennis Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gear Coop company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gear Coop company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gear Coop company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. company nor Gear Coop company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. company nor Gear Coop company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gear Coop company employs more people globally than Street Tennis Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. nor Gear Coop holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H