Comparison Overview

Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System

VS

Center for Relational Care

Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System

1400 E. Irving Park Road, Streamwood, IL, 60107, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System (SBHS) is a 160-bed acute care facility located in Streamwood,IL and has been providing mental health treatment to the Chicagoland community and the state of Illinois since 1991. We are dedicated to offering services to meet the ever-changing emotional and behavioral healthcare needs of children, adolescents, and their families. Seeking help for a loved one can be stressful and may leave parents, guardians and families feeling overwhelmed. We understand that dealing with an emotional or behavioral health issue affects the entire family, not just the individual seeking or needing help. That is why our approach to healing takes into account the entire social environment for the children, adolescents and young adults in our care. This includes the family, school, living situation and community. Service Excellence and Customer Engagement are important parts of our philosophy and our entire staff is dedicated to providing H.O.P.E.-Healthy Opportunities in a Peaceful Environment-for all of those in our care. Call us today: (630) 837-9000 or visit www.streamwoodhospital.com.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 249
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Relational Care

11615 Angus Rd., Austin, TX, 78759, US
Last Update:

For Current and Former Clients of CRC: The Center for Relational Care has a business LinkedIn page. You are welcome to follow us on this page. However, please do so only if you are comfortable with the general public being aware of the fact that your name is attached to the Center for Relational Care. Please refrain from making contact with us using comments or messages on social media. These methods have insufficient privacy and security, and we do not watch them closely. We would not want to miss an important message from you. Finally, please be aware that it is our policy for our therapists not to accept friend requests from any current or former clients on their personal social networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, etc. because it may compromise your confidentiality. Who We Are The Center for Relational Care provides counseling services for healing and change. We serve children, families, single adults, and married couples as well as provide trauma recovery therapy, especially for those seeking EMDR Therapy. We seek to bring hope and healing to broken relationships, wounded hearts, and struggling lives. Using biblical principles and sound counseling theory, we strive to help people deepen their relationship with God and others while gaining awareness about what’s standing in their way of experiencing more joy and meaning in life. As the flagship counseling center for “Intimacy Therapy,” CRC also uses its expertise to train counselors and pastoral leaders around the world in this counseling model that helps hurting people experience God’s presence, provision, compassion, and truth. Some of our clients choose to participate in the Accelerated Relational Care Process. This unique approach may help clients jump-start the counseling journey with 8-12 hours of counseling completed in a condensed period of time. This experience can be particularly helpful for couples and is also available for some individuals and families.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/streamwood-behavioral-healthcare-system.jpeg
Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-relational-care.jpeg
Center for Relational Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Relational Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Relational Care in 2026.

Incident History — Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Relational Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Relational Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/streamwood-behavioral-healthcare-system.jpeg
Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-relational-care.jpeg
Center for Relational Care
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company and Center for Relational Care company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Center for Relational Care company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company.

In the current year, Center for Relational Care company and Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Relational Care company nor Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Relational Care company nor Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Relational Care company nor Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company nor Center for Relational Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company nor Center for Relational Care company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System company employs more people globally than Center for Relational Care company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Streamwood Behavioral Healthcare System nor Center for Relational Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N