Comparison Overview

Stratus Packaging

VS

Fletcher Print

Stratus Packaging

70 Chemin des Baisses, BP 55, Viriat, FR, 01440
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The STRATUS group is listed amongst European leaders in the printed label manufacturing field. With 290 people, for a turn-over of 46,5 million euros in 2017, Stratus covers all your product package design problems (wrap-around labels, adhesive, sleeves, IML, flexible packages). In forming a 4 unit manufacturing industrial group, the Stratus group sought the most efficient organizational links whilst maintaining site culture and identity. It extends its offer and makes available to its customers the entire spectrum of product package designs which are amongst the widest range of the market. The size and dynamism of Stratus, its considerable capacity for reaction and adaptation, have granted the group a major position. Today we are ready to confront the challenges of tomorrow, being both attentive to the market and our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fletcher Print

30 Laidlaw Drive, Delacombe, Ballarat, Victoria 3350, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Fletcher Printers Ballarat is a family run business with a combined 65 years of experience in the printing industry. We have been operating in the Ballarat area Victoria for all that time. The Fletcher family started printing through Richard Fletcher in the 1940’s who then went on to open R.Fletcher & Sons in 1970. Three generations later and we have become Fletcher Printers. Those three generations have been involved in the three ages of printing, the Letterpress era – The offset era – and now we are in the digital phase. That knowledge has been passed down through the family. We offer a full range of print services which cover digital, offset printing & letterpress. We pride ourselves on our personalised customer service and we like to put 100% effort into producing great results for our clients. Fletcher Printers are aware of the concerns in regard to the environment, we use vegetable based inks and encourage the use of recycled stock. We will work with you to tailor the best printing solution that will suit your needs and budget.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stratus-packaging.jpeg
Stratus Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fletcher-printers.jpeg
Fletcher Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stratus Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fletcher Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stratus Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fletcher Print in 2025.

Incident History — Stratus Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stratus Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fletcher Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fletcher Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stratus-packaging.jpeg
Stratus Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fletcher-printers.jpeg
Fletcher Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fletcher Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stratus Packaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fletcher Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stratus Packaging company.

In the current year, Fletcher Print company and Stratus Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fletcher Print company nor Stratus Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fletcher Print company nor Stratus Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fletcher Print company nor Stratus Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stratus Packaging company nor Fletcher Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stratus Packaging company nor Fletcher Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stratus Packaging company employs more people globally than Fletcher Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Fletcher Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L