Comparison Overview

Stratus Packaging

VS

Armor Graphics, Inc.

Stratus Packaging

70 Chemin des Baisses, BP 55, Viriat, FR, 01440
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The STRATUS group is listed amongst European leaders in the printed label manufacturing field. With 290 people, for a turn-over of 46,5 million euros in 2017, Stratus covers all your product package design problems (wrap-around labels, adhesive, sleeves, IML, flexible packages). In forming a 4 unit manufacturing industrial group, the Stratus group sought the most efficient organizational links whilst maintaining site culture and identity. It extends its offer and makes available to its customers the entire spectrum of product package designs which are amongst the widest range of the market. The size and dynamism of Stratus, its considerable capacity for reaction and adaptation, have granted the group a major position. Today we are ready to confront the challenges of tomorrow, being both attentive to the market and our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Armor Graphics, Inc.

1102 Ogletown Road, Newark, De, 19711, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Armor Graphics, Inc. is a women owned Graphic Design and Commercial Printing Company. Our storefront location is located at 1102 Ogletown Road in Newark Delaware. This Graphic Design Center houses our top notch Designers as well as our Cutting Edge Digital Printing Devices. From a Graphic Design for your company's Billboard or Marketing Piece and down to a Sign or Banner for your child's next birthday, it is our privilege to enhance your professional and personal life with Colorful Graphics from Juan Rodriquez and his Design Team. Our Offset Print Production Building is not open to the public, but may be toured upon scheduling of an appointment. National and International Delivery options are available for companies of all sizes. Our Customer Relations Manager, Rodney Jordan, will be happy to accommodate any requests for information or scheduling of a tour of our facilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stratus-packaging.jpeg
Stratus Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/armor-graphics-inc..jpeg
Armor Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stratus Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Armor Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stratus Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Armor Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Stratus Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stratus Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Armor Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Armor Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stratus-packaging.jpeg
Stratus Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/armor-graphics-inc..jpeg
Armor Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Armor Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stratus Packaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Armor Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stratus Packaging company.

In the current year, Armor Graphics, Inc. company and Stratus Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. company nor Stratus Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. company nor Stratus Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. company nor Stratus Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stratus Packaging company nor Armor Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stratus Packaging company nor Armor Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stratus Packaging company employs more people globally than Armor Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stratus Packaging nor Armor Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L