Comparison Overview

Strategic Partnerships, Inc.

VS

Shawmut Strategies Group

Strategic Partnerships, Inc.

7500 Rialto Boulevard, Austin, Texas, 78735, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spartnerships.com/

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. (SPI) is a nationally recognized leader in public sector business development and procurement consulting. Since 1995, SPI's team of 200+ former government executives have provided unmatched expertise and a comprehensive suite of services to help businesses of all sizes navigate the complexities of government procurement at various levels and expand their reach in the public sector. With a proven track record of success, SPI is trusted by seasoned government contractors working to grow market share and by businesses new to the government marketplace. Our unique approach combines industry insights with hands-on experience to deliver results-driven strategies, including expertise in Public-Private Partnerships (P3s). Explore how SPI can support your business growth and success at www.spartnerships.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Shawmut Strategies Group

11 Beacon St., Suite 1125, Boston, MA, US, 02108
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.shawmutsg.com/

At Shawmut Strategies Group, we make government more accessible so our clients can thrive. At its core, the work we do is about helping people better understand each other. We deliver for our clients by strategically bridging the communications gap among stakeholders, putting our political, policy, and process expertise to work.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strategic-partnerships-inc..jpeg
Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shawmut-strategies.jpeg
Shawmut Strategies Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shawmut Strategies Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strategic Partnerships, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shawmut Strategies Group in 2025.

Incident History — Strategic Partnerships, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shawmut Strategies Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shawmut Strategies Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strategic-partnerships-inc..jpeg
Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shawmut-strategies.jpeg
Shawmut Strategies Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shawmut Strategies Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shawmut Strategies Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company.

In the current year, Shawmut Strategies Group company and Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group company nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group company nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group company nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company nor Shawmut Strategies Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company nor Shawmut Strategies Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company employs more people globally than Shawmut Strategies Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. nor Shawmut Strategies Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References