Comparison Overview

Strategic Health Law

VS

Brown Law Group

Strategic Health Law

600 Market St, Chapel Hill, 27516, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are healthcare lawyers serving dozens of clients across the country. Many of them provide products and services like health insurance, Medicare and Medicaid health plans, pharmaceuticals and healthcare services. Since 2005, Strategic Health Law has helped our clients thrive in an ever-changing environment. We excel at recognizing your resources and understanding your operations. We help you move your business forward while staying compliant. We swiftly identify issues and help you mitigate risk while keeping small problems small. We take care to develop strong long-term client relationships because we’re in this with you for the long haul. We show up every day with a positive attitude, a much-needed sense of humor and a no-nonsense approach to our work. We have experience serving a variety of clients, with special depth of knowledge in assisting: • Health insurers • Service providers for government health plans • Global pharmaceutical companies • Investors evaluating compliance requirements In addition to partnering with in-house counsel and compliance teams, we work closely with senior leadership, management, and front line-level personnel in Sales and Marketing, Procurement, Appeals, Utilization Management, Customer Service, Claims, and Information Systems.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brown Law Group

600 B Street, Suite 1650, San Diego, CA, 92101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Brown Law Group, a leading Southern California litigation firm, specializes in all aspects of employment law and business litigation. Though fierce advocates, the firm also approaches every legal problem practically, from the client’s point of view. Clients choose Brown Law Group because of its impressive record of success coupled with its uncompromising commitment to the ethical practice of law. Comprised of highly qualified and principled attorneys, Brown Law Group has experience in representing clients of all sizes, who seek unsurpassed excellence in analysis and work product.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strategic-health-law.jpeg
Strategic Health Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-law-group.jpeg
Brown Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strategic Health Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brown Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strategic Health Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Strategic Health Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strategic Health Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brown Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strategic-health-law.jpeg
Strategic Health Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-law-group.jpeg
Brown Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Strategic Health Law company and Brown Law Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Brown Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strategic Health Law company.

In the current year, Brown Law Group company and Strategic Health Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brown Law Group company nor Strategic Health Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brown Law Group company nor Strategic Health Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brown Law Group company nor Strategic Health Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strategic Health Law company nor Brown Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strategic Health Law company nor Brown Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brown Law Group company employs more people globally than Strategic Health Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strategic Health Law nor Brown Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X